Demographics details for Orland park, IL vs Chandler, AZ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Orland park, IL vs Chandler, AZ.

Data Orland park Chandler
Population 57,511 280,711
Median Age 46.6 years 37.0 years
Median Income $97,365 $99,374
Married Families 48.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 6% 6%
Unemployment Rate 5.4 3.0

Population Comparison: Orland park vs Chandler

  • The population in Chandler is higher at 280,711, compared to 57,511 in Orland park.
  • Residents in Orland park have a higher median age of 46.6 years compared to 37.0 years in Chandler.
  • Chandler has a higher median income of $99,374, compared to $97,365 in Orland park.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Orland park at 48.0% compared to 41.0% in Chandler.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Orland park and Chandler at 6%.
  • The unemployment rate in Orland park is higher at 5.4%, compared to 3.0% in Chandler.

Demographics

Demographics Orland park vs Chandler provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Orland park Chandler
Black 4 6
White 76 48
Asian 5 12
Hispanic 10 21
Two or More Races 5 11
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Orland park vs Chandler

  • In Chandler, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 4% in Orland park.
  • Orland park has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 48% in Chandler.
  • In Chandler, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 5% in Orland park.
  • Chandler has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 10% in Orland park.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chandler at 11%, compared to 5% in Orland park.
  • In Chandler, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Orland park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Orland park Chandler
Mental Health Not Good 13.2% 15.4%
Physical Health Not Good 8.6% 9.0%
Depression 18.2% 18.5%
Smoking 11.7% 11.8%
Binge Drinking 20.2% 18.2%
Obesity 26.8% 27.9%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Orland park vs Chandler

  • In Chandler, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 13.2% in Orland park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Chandler at 18.5% versus 18.2% in Orland park.
  • Chandler has a higher smoking rate at 11.8% compared to 11.7% in Orland park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Orland park at 20.2% compared to 18.2% in Chandler.
  • Chandler has higher obesity rates at 27.9% compared to 26.8% in Orland park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Orland park at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Chandler.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Orland park Chandler
No Schooling 0.5% (297) 0.8% (2,196)
High School Diploma 16.1% (9,262) 10.1% (28,272)
Less than High School 8.3% (4,763) 6.8% (18,988)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 31.9% (18,372) 31.0% (86,947)

Education Levels Comparison: Orland park vs Chandler

  • In Chandler, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Orland park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Orland park hold a high school diploma at 16.1% compared to 10.1% in Chandler.
  • More residents in Orland park have less than a high school education at 8.3% compared to 6.8% in Chandler.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Orland park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.9% compared to 31.0% in Chandler.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.