Demographics details for Orefield, PA vs Gillette, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Orefield, PA vs Gillette, NJ.
| Data | Orefield | Gillette |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 945 | 3,251 |
| Median Age | 40.0 years | 41.0 years |
| Median Income | $72,000 | $145,000 |
| Married Families | 65.0% | 62.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 2% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Orefield vs Gillette
- The population in Gillette is higher at 3,251, compared to 945 in Orefield.
- The median age in Gillette is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 40.0 years in Orefield.
- Gillette has a higher median income of $145,000, compared to $72,000 in Orefield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Orefield at 65.0% compared to 62.0% in Gillette.
- Orefield has a higher poverty level at 4% compared to 2% in Gillette.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Orefield and Gillette at 3.0%.
Demographics
Demographics Orefield vs Gillette provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Orefield | Gillette |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 90 | 90 |
| Asian | 2 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Orefield vs Gillette
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Orefield at 2% compared to 1% in Gillette.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Orefield and Gillette at 90%.
- In Gillette, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Orefield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Orefield at 3% compared to 2% in Gillette.
- Both Orefield and Gillette have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Orefield and Gillette at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Orefield | Gillette |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Orefield vs Gillette
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Orefield and Gillette at 0.0%.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 0.0%.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Orefield and Gillette at 0.0%.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Orefield and Gillette at 0.0%.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 0.0%.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Orefield and Gillette at 0.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Orefield | Gillette |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Orefield vs Gillette
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Orefield and Gillette at 0.0%.
- Both cities have the same percentage of residents with high school diplomas at 0.0%.
- Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 0.0%.
- The percentage of residents with a bachelor's degree or higher is identical in both Orefield and Gillette at 0.0%.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.