Demographics details for Orefield, PA vs Flomaton, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Orefield, PA vs Flomaton, AL.
Data | Orefield | Flomaton |
---|---|---|
Population | 945 | 1,458 |
Median Age | 40.0 years | 32.6 years |
Median Income | $72,000 | $37,500 |
Married Families | 65.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Orefield vs Flomaton
- The population in Flomaton is higher at 1,458, compared to 945 in Orefield.
- Residents in Orefield have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 32.6 years in Flomaton.
- Orefield has a higher median income of $72,000 compared to $37,500 in Flomaton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Orefield at 65.0% compared to 35.0% in Flomaton.
- The poverty level is higher in Flomaton at 15%, compared to 4% in Orefield.
- Flomaton has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.0% in Orefield.
Demographics
Demographics Orefield vs Flomaton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Orefield | Flomaton |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 38 |
White | 90 | 58 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Orefield vs Flomaton
- In Flomaton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 2% in Orefield.
- Orefield has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 58% in Flomaton.
- The Asian population is larger in Orefield at 2% compared to 0% in Flomaton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Orefield at 3% compared to 0% in Flomaton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Flomaton at 4%, compared to 3% in Orefield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Orefield and Flomaton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Orefield | Flomaton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 21.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 15.3% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 24.6% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 24.1% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 13.7% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 45.3% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Orefield vs Flomaton
- In Flomaton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Flomaton at 24.6% versus 0.0% in Orefield.
- Flomaton has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Flomaton at 13.7% compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
- Flomaton has higher obesity rates at 45.3% compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Flomaton at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Orefield | Flomaton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 25.0% (364) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 19.1% (278) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 9.4% (137) |
Education Levels Comparison: Orefield vs Flomaton
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Orefield and Flomaton at 0.0%.
- In Flomaton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.0% compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Flomaton at 19.1%, compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
- In Flomaton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.4% compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.