Demographics details for Orefield, PA vs Andrews, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Orefield, PA vs Andrews, TX.
Data | Orefield | Andrews |
---|---|---|
Population | 945 | 13,276 |
Median Age | 40.0 years | 31.9 years |
Median Income | $72,000 | $86,806 |
Married Families | 65.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Orefield vs Andrews
- The population in Andrews is higher at 13,276, compared to 945 in Orefield.
- Residents in Orefield have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 31.9 years in Andrews.
- Andrews has a higher median income of $86,806, compared to $72,000 in Orefield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Orefield at 65.0% compared to 44.0% in Andrews.
- The poverty level is higher in Andrews at 10%, compared to 4% in Orefield.
- Andrews has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.0% in Orefield.
Demographics
Demographics Orefield vs Andrews provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Orefield | Andrews |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 3 |
White | 90 | 26 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 3 | 54 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 16 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Orefield vs Andrews
- In Andrews, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Orefield.
- Orefield has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 26% in Andrews.
- The Asian population is larger in Orefield at 2% compared to 1% in Andrews.
- Andrews has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 54%, compared to 3% in Orefield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Andrews at 16%, compared to 3% in Orefield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Orefield and Andrews at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Orefield | Andrews |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 17.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 12.8% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 23.1% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 17.5% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 17.9% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 38.4% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Orefield vs Andrews
- In Andrews, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Andrews at 23.1% versus 0.0% in Orefield.
- Andrews has a higher smoking rate at 17.5% compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Andrews at 17.9% compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
- Andrews has higher obesity rates at 38.4% compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Andrews at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Orefield | Andrews |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 3.2% (428) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 15.6% (2,070) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 27.9% (3,710) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 13.4% (1,773) |
Education Levels Comparison: Orefield vs Andrews
- In Andrews, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
- In Andrews, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Andrews at 27.9%, compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
- In Andrews, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.4% compared to 0.0% in Orefield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.