Demographics details for Ordway, CO vs Fort washington, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ordway, CO vs Fort washington, MD.
Data | Ordway | Fort washington |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,091 | 25,825 |
Median Age | 42.0 years | 44.1 years |
Median Income | $45,938 | $143,623 |
Married Families | 49.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Ordway vs Fort washington
- The population in Fort washington is higher at 25,825, compared to 1,091 in Ordway.
- The median age in Fort washington is higher at 44.1 years, compared to 42.0 years in Ordway.
- Fort washington has a higher median income of $143,623, compared to $45,938 in Ordway.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ordway at 49.0% compared to 43.0% in Fort washington.
- Ordway has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Fort washington.
- The unemployment rate in Ordway is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Fort washington.
Demographics
Demographics Ordway vs Fort washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Ordway | Fort washington |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 61 |
White | 5 | 8 |
Asian | Data is updating | 8 |
Hispanic | 49 | 17 |
Two or More Races | 35 | 6 |
American Indian | 7 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ordway vs Fort washington
- In Fort washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 61% compared to 4% in Ordway.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort washington at 8% compared to 5% in Ordway.
- In Fort washington, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 0% in Ordway.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ordway at 49% compared to 17% in Fort washington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ordway at 35% compared to 6% in Fort washington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Ordway at 7% compared to 0% in Fort washington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Ordway | Fort washington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 12.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.8% | 7.9% |
Depression | 25.1% | 11.6% |
Smoking | 21.8% | 9.6% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 12.0% |
Obesity | 31.7% | 37.7% |
Disability Percentage | 41.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ordway vs Fort washington
- More residents in Ordway report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 12.5% in Fort washington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ordway at 25.1% compared to 11.6% in Fort washington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ordway at 21.8% compared to 9.6% in Fort washington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ordway at 16.9% compared to 12.0% in Fort washington.
- Fort washington has higher obesity rates at 37.7% compared to 31.7% in Ordway.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ordway at 41.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort washington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Ordway | Fort washington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (4) | 1.2% (297) |
High School Diploma | 35.7% (389) | 14.4% (3,710) |
Less than High School | 27.1% (296) | 8.3% (2,138) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.9% (195) | 31.8% (8,208) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ordway vs Fort washington
- In Fort washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.4% in Ordway.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ordway hold a high school diploma at 35.7% compared to 14.4% in Fort washington.
- More residents in Ordway have less than a high school education at 27.1% compared to 8.3% in Fort washington.
- In Fort washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 17.9% in Ordway.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.