Environment details: Onalaska TX
poor quality, high contaminants.
Environment details: San mateo CA
water quality is generally good with minimal issues.
Compare Environment: Onalaska TX vs San mateo CA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Onalaska | San mateo |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 5308 | 2592 |
| Water Quality | 3/10 | 7/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | poor quality, high contaminants. | water quality is generally good with minimal issues. |
| Median Air Quality | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.53 | 1.93 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 18 | 46 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Onalaska vs San mateo
- The water quality in San mateo is superior at 7/10 compared to 3/10 in Onalaska.
- San mateo has a better median air quality index at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Onalaska.
- Air quality is better in San mateo with an average index of 1.93 compared to 1.53 in Onalaska.
- San mateo experiences more days with poor air quality at 46 compared to 18 in Onalaska.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.