Demographics details for Onalaska, TX vs Red river, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Onalaska, TX vs Red river, NM.
| Data | Onalaska | Red river |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,205 | 539 |
| Median Age | 45.2 years | 43.3 years |
| Median Income | $56,168 | $49,479 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Onalaska vs Red river
- In Onalaska, the population is higher at 3,205, compared to 539 in Red river.
- Residents in Onalaska have a higher median age of 45.2 years compared to 43.3 years in Red river.
- Onalaska has a higher median income of $56,168 compared to $49,479 in Red river.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Onalaska at 35.0% compared to 27.0% in Red river.
- The poverty level is identical in both Onalaska and Red river at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Onalaska is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Red river.
Demographics
Demographics Onalaska vs Red river provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Onalaska | Red river |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 91 | 89 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Onalaska vs Red river
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Onalaska at 1% compared to 0% in Red river.
- Onalaska has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 89% in Red river.
- Both Onalaska and Red river have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Red river has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 3% in Onalaska.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Onalaska at 5% compared to 2% in Red river.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Onalaska and Red river at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Onalaska | Red river |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 20.4% | 15.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 27.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Onalaska vs Red river
- More residents in Onalaska report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.2% in Red river.
- Depression is more prevalent in Onalaska at 26.0% compared to 22.0% in Red river.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Onalaska at 20.4% compared to 15.8% in Red river.
- Binge drinking is more common in Onalaska at 19.4% compared to 17.1% in Red river.
- Obesity rates are higher in Onalaska at 39.9% compared to 27.1% in Red river.
- Disability percentages are higher in Onalaska at 24.0% compared to 17.0% in Red river.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Onalaska | Red river |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (21) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (491) | 5.9% (32) |
| Less than High School | 21.5% (689) | 6.7% (36) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.0% (161) | 26.2% (141) |
Education Levels Comparison: Onalaska vs Red river
- A higher percentage of residents in Onalaska have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Red river.
- A higher percentage of residents in Onalaska hold a high school diploma at 15.3% compared to 5.9% in Red river.
- More residents in Onalaska have less than a high school education at 21.5% compared to 6.7% in Red river.
- In Red river, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 5.0% in Onalaska.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.