Demographics details for Onalaska, TX vs Park ridge, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Onalaska, TX vs Park ridge, NJ.
| Data | Onalaska | Park ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,205 | 9,426 |
| Median Age | 45.2 years | 47.8 years |
| Median Income | $56,168 | $164,241 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Onalaska vs Park ridge
- The population in Park ridge is higher at 9,426, compared to 3,205 in Onalaska.
- The median age in Park ridge is higher at 47.8 years, compared to 45.2 years in Onalaska.
- Park ridge has a higher median income of $164,241, compared to $56,168 in Onalaska.
- In Park ridge, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 35.0% in Onalaska.
- Onalaska has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Park ridge.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Onalaska and Park ridge at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Onalaska vs Park ridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Onalaska | Park ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 91 | 77 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Onalaska vs Park ridge
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Onalaska and Park ridge at 1%.
- Onalaska has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 77% in Park ridge.
- In Park ridge, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Onalaska.
- Park ridge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 3% in Onalaska.
- Both Onalaska and Park ridge have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Onalaska and Park ridge at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Onalaska | Park ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 13.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 7.4% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 20.4% | 10.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 24.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Onalaska vs Park ridge
- More residents in Onalaska report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 13.1% in Park ridge.
- Depression is more prevalent in Onalaska at 26.0% compared to 17.8% in Park ridge.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Onalaska at 20.4% compared to 10.2% in Park ridge.
- Binge drinking is more common in Onalaska at 19.4% compared to 18.7% in Park ridge.
- Obesity rates are higher in Onalaska at 39.9% compared to 24.6% in Park ridge.
- Disability percentages are higher in Onalaska at 24.0% compared to 5.0% in Park ridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Onalaska | Park ridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (21) | 0.3% (27) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (491) | 12.4% (1,169) |
| Less than High School | 21.5% (689) | 5.8% (549) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.0% (161) | 37.8% (3,565) |
Education Levels Comparison: Onalaska vs Park ridge
- A higher percentage of residents in Onalaska have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.3% in Park ridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Onalaska hold a high school diploma at 15.3% compared to 12.4% in Park ridge.
- More residents in Onalaska have less than a high school education at 21.5% compared to 5.8% in Park ridge.
- In Park ridge, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.8% compared to 5.0% in Onalaska.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.