Demographics details for Onalaska, TX vs New kensington, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Onalaska, TX vs New kensington, PA.

Data Onalaska New kensington
Population 3,205 13,116
Median Age 45.2 years 41.0 years
Median Income $56,168 $56,867
Married Families 35.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 12% 15%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 6.1

Population Comparison: Onalaska vs New kensington

  • The population in New kensington is higher at 13,116, compared to 3,205 in Onalaska.
  • Residents in Onalaska have a higher median age of 45.2 years compared to 41.0 years in New kensington.
  • New kensington has a higher median income of $56,867, compared to $56,168 in Onalaska.
  • In New kensington, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 35.0% in Onalaska.
  • The poverty level is higher in New kensington at 15%, compared to 12% in Onalaska.
  • New kensington has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 4.5% in Onalaska.

Demographics

Demographics Onalaska vs New kensington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Onalaska New kensington
Black 1 20
White 91 76
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 3 3
Two or More Races 5 1
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Onalaska vs New kensington

  • In New kensington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 1% in Onalaska.
  • Onalaska has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 76% in New kensington.
  • Both Onalaska and New kensington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Onalaska and New kensington at 3%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Onalaska at 5% compared to 1% in New kensington.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Onalaska and New kensington at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Onalaska New kensington
Mental Health Not Good 19.0% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 12.5% Data is updating%
Depression 26.0% Data is updating%
Smoking 20.4% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 19.4% Data is updating%
Obesity 39.9% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 24.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Onalaska vs New kensington

  • More residents in Onalaska report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in New kensington.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Onalaska at 26.0% compared to 0.0% in New kensington.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Onalaska at 20.4% compared to 0.0% in New kensington.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Onalaska at 19.4% compared to 0.0% in New kensington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Onalaska at 39.9% compared to 0.0% in New kensington.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Onalaska at 24.0% compared to 0.0% in New kensington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Onalaska New kensington
No Schooling 0.7% (21) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 15.3% (491) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 21.5% (689) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 5.0% (161) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Onalaska vs New kensington

  • A higher percentage of residents in Onalaska have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in New kensington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Onalaska hold a high school diploma at 15.3% compared to 0.0% in New kensington.
  • More residents in Onalaska have less than a high school education at 21.5% compared to 0.0% in New kensington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Onalaska hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 5.0% compared to 0.0% in New kensington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.