Demographics details for Onalaska, TX vs Monroe, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Onalaska, TX vs Monroe, MI.
| Data | Onalaska | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,205 | 20,295 |
| Median Age | 45.2 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $56,168 | $57,779 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Population Comparison: Onalaska vs Monroe
- The population in Monroe is higher at 20,295, compared to 3,205 in Onalaska.
- Residents in Onalaska have a higher median age of 45.2 years compared to 36.6 years in Monroe.
- Monroe has a higher median income of $57,779, compared to $56,168 in Onalaska.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Onalaska at 35.0% compared to 33.0% in Monroe.
- The poverty level is identical in both Onalaska and Monroe at 12%.
- Monroe has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 4.5% in Onalaska.
Demographics
Demographics Onalaska vs Monroe provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Onalaska | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 6 |
| White | 91 | 86 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Onalaska vs Monroe
- In Monroe, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Onalaska.
- Onalaska has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 86% in Monroe.
- In Monroe, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Onalaska.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Onalaska and Monroe at 3%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Onalaska at 5% compared to 4% in Monroe.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Onalaska and Monroe at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Onalaska | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 20.4% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 43.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Onalaska vs Monroe
- In Monroe, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 19.0% in Onalaska.
- Depression is more prevalent in Onalaska at 26.0% compared to 25.7% in Monroe.
- Monroe has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 20.4% in Onalaska.
- Binge drinking is more common in Onalaska at 19.4% compared to 17.5% in Monroe.
- Monroe has higher obesity rates at 43.7% compared to 39.9% in Onalaska.
- Disability percentages are higher in Onalaska at 24.0% compared to 16.0% in Monroe.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Onalaska | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (21) | 0.5% (105) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (491) | 17.0% (3,449) |
| Less than High School | 21.5% (689) | 13.0% (2,633) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.0% (161) | 13.2% (2,681) |
Education Levels Comparison: Onalaska vs Monroe
- A higher percentage of residents in Onalaska have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Monroe.
- In Monroe, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 15.3% in Onalaska.
- More residents in Onalaska have less than a high school education at 21.5% compared to 13.0% in Monroe.
- In Monroe, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 5.0% in Onalaska.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.