Demographics details for Onalaska, TX vs Marshall, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Onalaska, TX vs Marshall, MI.
| Data | Onalaska | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,205 | 6,753 |
| Median Age | 45.2 years | 45.4 years |
| Median Income | $56,168 | $72,813 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Onalaska vs Marshall
- The population in Marshall is higher at 6,753, compared to 3,205 in Onalaska.
- The median age in Marshall is higher at 45.4 years, compared to 45.2 years in Onalaska.
- Marshall has a higher median income of $72,813, compared to $56,168 in Onalaska.
- In Marshall, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 35.0% in Onalaska.
- Onalaska has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Marshall.
- The unemployment rate in Onalaska is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Marshall.
Demographics
Demographics Onalaska vs Marshall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Onalaska | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 91 | 94 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Onalaska vs Marshall
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Onalaska at 1% compared to 0% in Marshall.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Marshall at 94% compared to 91% in Onalaska.
- Both Onalaska and Marshall have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Marshall has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in Onalaska.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Onalaska at 5% compared to 2% in Marshall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Onalaska and Marshall at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Onalaska | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 25.2% |
| Smoking | 20.4% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 37.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Onalaska vs Marshall
- More residents in Onalaska report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.0% in Marshall.
- Depression is more prevalent in Onalaska at 26.0% compared to 25.2% in Marshall.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Onalaska at 20.4% compared to 17.3% in Marshall.
- Binge drinking is more common in Onalaska at 19.4% compared to 18.0% in Marshall.
- Obesity rates are higher in Onalaska at 39.9% compared to 37.5% in Marshall.
- Disability percentages are higher in Onalaska at 24.0% compared to 11.0% in Marshall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Onalaska | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (21) | 0.7% (46) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (491) | 15.8% (1,067) |
| Less than High School | 21.5% (689) | 7.3% (493) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.0% (161) | 33.1% (2,233) |
Education Levels Comparison: Onalaska vs Marshall
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Onalaska and Marshall at 0.7%.
- In Marshall, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.8% compared to 15.3% in Onalaska.
- More residents in Onalaska have less than a high school education at 21.5% compared to 7.3% in Marshall.
- In Marshall, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.1% compared to 5.0% in Onalaska.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.