Demographics details for Onalaska, TX vs Lansing, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Onalaska, TX vs Lansing, MI.
| Data | Onalaska | Lansing |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,205 | 112,537 |
| Median Age | 45.2 years | 32.9 years |
| Median Income | $56,168 | $50,747 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 7.4 |
Population Comparison: Onalaska vs Lansing
- The population in Lansing is higher at 112,537, compared to 3,205 in Onalaska.
- Residents in Onalaska have a higher median age of 45.2 years compared to 32.9 years in Lansing.
- Onalaska has a higher median income of $56,168 compared to $50,747 in Lansing.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Onalaska at 35.0% compared to 28.0% in Lansing.
- The poverty level is higher in Lansing at 19%, compared to 12% in Onalaska.
- Lansing has a higher unemployment rate at 7.4% compared to 4.5% in Onalaska.
Demographics
Demographics Onalaska vs Lansing provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Onalaska | Lansing |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 24 |
| White | 91 | 48 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Onalaska vs Lansing
- In Lansing, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 24% compared to 1% in Onalaska.
- Onalaska has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 48% in Lansing.
- In Lansing, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Onalaska.
- Lansing has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 3% in Onalaska.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lansing at 10%, compared to 5% in Onalaska.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Onalaska and Lansing at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Onalaska | Lansing |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 26.3% |
| Smoking | 20.4% | 19.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 40.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Onalaska vs Lansing
- In Lansing, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 19.0% in Onalaska.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lansing at 26.3% versus 26.0% in Onalaska.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Onalaska at 20.4% compared to 19.6% in Lansing.
- Binge drinking is more common in Onalaska at 19.4% compared to 16.0% in Lansing.
- Lansing has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 39.9% in Onalaska.
- Disability percentages are higher in Onalaska at 24.0% compared to 17.0% in Lansing.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Onalaska | Lansing |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (21) | 1.3% (1,419) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (491) | 13.5% (15,216) |
| Less than High School | 21.5% (689) | 10.0% (11,269) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.0% (161) | 19.3% (21,667) |
Education Levels Comparison: Onalaska vs Lansing
- In Lansing, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.7% in Onalaska.
- A higher percentage of residents in Onalaska hold a high school diploma at 15.3% compared to 13.5% in Lansing.
- More residents in Onalaska have less than a high school education at 21.5% compared to 10.0% in Lansing.
- In Lansing, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 5.0% in Onalaska.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.