Demographics details for Onalaska, TX vs Kingston, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Onalaska, TX vs Kingston, TN.
| Data | Onalaska | Kingston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,205 | 6,115 |
| Median Age | 45.2 years | 44.7 years |
| Median Income | $56,168 | $67,637 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Onalaska vs Kingston
- The population in Kingston is higher at 6,115, compared to 3,205 in Onalaska.
- Residents in Onalaska have a higher median age of 45.2 years compared to 44.7 years in Kingston.
- Kingston has a higher median income of $67,637, compared to $56,168 in Onalaska.
- In Kingston, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 35.0% in Onalaska.
- The poverty level is identical in both Onalaska and Kingston at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Onalaska is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.4% in Kingston.
Demographics
Demographics Onalaska vs Kingston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Onalaska | Kingston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 4 |
| White | 91 | 91 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Onalaska vs Kingston
- In Kingston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 1% in Onalaska.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Onalaska and Kingston at 91%.
- Both Onalaska and Kingston have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Onalaska at 3% compared to 2% in Kingston.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Onalaska at 5% compared to 3% in Kingston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Onalaska and Kingston at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Onalaska | Kingston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 11.2% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 20.4% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 34.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Onalaska vs Kingston
- More residents in Onalaska report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.7% in Kingston.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kingston at 26.6% versus 26.0% in Onalaska.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Onalaska at 20.4% compared to 18.0% in Kingston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Onalaska at 19.4% compared to 16.9% in Kingston.
- Obesity rates are higher in Onalaska at 39.9% compared to 34.5% in Kingston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Onalaska at 24.0% compared to 20.0% in Kingston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Onalaska | Kingston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (21) | 0.4% (25) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (491) | 23.4% (1,433) |
| Less than High School | 21.5% (689) | 10.0% (613) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.0% (161) | 16.5% (1,009) |
Education Levels Comparison: Onalaska vs Kingston
- A higher percentage of residents in Onalaska have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Kingston.
- In Kingston, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.4% compared to 15.3% in Onalaska.
- More residents in Onalaska have less than a high school education at 21.5% compared to 10.0% in Kingston.
- In Kingston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 5.0% in Onalaska.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.