Demographics details for Onalaska, TX vs Hattiesburg, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Onalaska, TX vs Hattiesburg, MS.
| Data | Onalaska | Hattiesburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,205 | 48,455 |
| Median Age | 45.2 years | 28.5 years |
| Median Income | $56,168 | $41,024 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 23% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Onalaska vs Hattiesburg
- The population in Hattiesburg is higher at 48,455, compared to 3,205 in Onalaska.
- Residents in Onalaska have a higher median age of 45.2 years compared to 28.5 years in Hattiesburg.
- Onalaska has a higher median income of $56,168 compared to $41,024 in Hattiesburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Onalaska at 35.0% compared to 23.0% in Hattiesburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Hattiesburg at 23%, compared to 12% in Onalaska.
- The unemployment rate in Onalaska is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Hattiesburg.
Demographics
Demographics Onalaska vs Hattiesburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Onalaska | Hattiesburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 52 |
| White | 91 | 38 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Onalaska vs Hattiesburg
- In Hattiesburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 52% compared to 1% in Onalaska.
- Onalaska has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 38% in Hattiesburg.
- In Hattiesburg, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Onalaska.
- Hattiesburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in Onalaska.
- Both Onalaska and Hattiesburg have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Onalaska and Hattiesburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Onalaska | Hattiesburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 17.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 20.7% |
| Smoking | 20.4% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 12.9% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 43.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Onalaska vs Hattiesburg
- More residents in Onalaska report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.3% in Hattiesburg.
- Depression is more prevalent in Onalaska at 26.0% compared to 20.7% in Hattiesburg.
- Hattiesburg has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 20.4% in Onalaska.
- Binge drinking is more common in Onalaska at 19.4% compared to 12.9% in Hattiesburg.
- Hattiesburg has higher obesity rates at 43.0% compared to 39.9% in Onalaska.
- Disability percentages are higher in Onalaska at 24.0% compared to 19.0% in Hattiesburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Onalaska | Hattiesburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (21) | 0.7% (362) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (491) | 10.4% (5,022) |
| Less than High School | 21.5% (689) | 7.5% (3,642) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.0% (161) | 20.2% (9,782) |
Education Levels Comparison: Onalaska vs Hattiesburg
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Onalaska and Hattiesburg at 0.7%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Onalaska hold a high school diploma at 15.3% compared to 10.4% in Hattiesburg.
- More residents in Onalaska have less than a high school education at 21.5% compared to 7.5% in Hattiesburg.
- In Hattiesburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 5.0% in Onalaska.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.