Demographics details for Onalaska, TX vs Cedar lake, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Onalaska, TX vs Cedar lake, IN.
| Data | Onalaska | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,205 | 15,592 |
| Median Age | 45.2 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $56,168 | $84,444 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Onalaska vs Cedar lake
- The population in Cedar lake is higher at 15,592, compared to 3,205 in Onalaska.
- Residents in Onalaska have a higher median age of 45.2 years compared to 39.5 years in Cedar lake.
- Cedar lake has a higher median income of $84,444, compared to $56,168 in Onalaska.
- In Cedar lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 35.0% in Onalaska.
- Onalaska has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Cedar lake.
- The unemployment rate in Onalaska is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Cedar lake.
Demographics
Demographics Onalaska vs Cedar lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Onalaska | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 91 | 94 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Onalaska vs Cedar lake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Onalaska at 1% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar lake at 94% compared to 91% in Onalaska.
- Both Onalaska and Cedar lake have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Onalaska and Cedar lake at 3%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Onalaska at 5% compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Onalaska and Cedar lake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Onalaska | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 20.4% | 18.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Onalaska vs Cedar lake
- More residents in Onalaska report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.6% in Cedar lake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Onalaska at 26.0% compared to 25.4% in Cedar lake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Onalaska at 20.4% compared to 18.8% in Cedar lake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar lake at 19.8% compared to 19.4% in Onalaska.
- Obesity rates are higher in Onalaska at 39.9% compared to 37.2% in Cedar lake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Onalaska at 24.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Onalaska | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (21) | 0.4% (67) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (491) | 21.1% (3,292) |
| Less than High School | 21.5% (689) | 7.1% (1,102) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.0% (161) | 14.1% (2,204) |
Education Levels Comparison: Onalaska vs Cedar lake
- A higher percentage of residents in Onalaska have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Cedar lake.
- In Cedar lake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.1% compared to 15.3% in Onalaska.
- More residents in Onalaska have less than a high school education at 21.5% compared to 7.1% in Cedar lake.
- In Cedar lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.1% compared to 5.0% in Onalaska.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.