Demographics details for Old bridge, NJ vs Little suamico, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Old bridge, NJ vs Little suamico, WI.

Data Old bridge Little suamico
Population 28,094 4,878
Median Age 43.2 years 41.0 years
Median Income $104,712 $74,800
Married Families 48.0% 56.0%
Poverty Level 5% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.1 3.2

Population Comparison: Old bridge vs Little suamico

  • In Old bridge, the population is higher at 28,094, compared to 4,878 in Little suamico.
  • Residents in Old bridge have a higher median age of 43.2 years compared to 41.0 years in Little suamico.
  • Old bridge has a higher median income of $104,712 compared to $74,800 in Little suamico.
  • In Little suamico, the percentage of married families is higher at 56.0%, compared to 48.0% in Old bridge.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Old bridge and Little suamico at 5%.
  • The unemployment rate in Old bridge is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.2% in Little suamico.

Demographics

Demographics Old bridge vs Little suamico provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Old bridge Little suamico
Black 4 1
White 61 95
Asian 13 1
Hispanic 16 2
Two or More Races 6 1
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Old bridge vs Little suamico

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Old bridge at 4% compared to 1% in Little suamico.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Little suamico at 95% compared to 61% in Old bridge.
  • The Asian population is larger in Old bridge at 13% compared to 1% in Little suamico.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Old bridge at 16% compared to 2% in Little suamico.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Old bridge at 6% compared to 1% in Little suamico.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Old bridge and Little suamico at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Old bridge Little suamico
Mental Health Not Good 14.3% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 8.6% Data is updating%
Depression 19.8% Data is updating%
Smoking 11.4% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 16.2% Data is updating%
Obesity 28.5% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 11.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Old bridge vs Little suamico

  • More residents in Old bridge report poor mental health at 14.3% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Old bridge at 19.8% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Old bridge at 11.4% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Old bridge at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Old bridge at 28.5% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Old bridge at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Old bridge Little suamico
No Schooling 1.1% (302) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 18.8% (5,278) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 8.2% (2,316) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 28.2% (7,918) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Old bridge vs Little suamico

  • A higher percentage of residents in Old bridge have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Old bridge hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • More residents in Old bridge have less than a high school education at 8.2% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Old bridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.2% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.