Demographics details for Old bridge, NJ vs Hancock, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Old bridge, NJ vs Hancock, MN.
| Data | Old bridge | Hancock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 28,094 | 857 |
| Median Age | 43.2 years | 35.9 years |
| Median Income | $104,712 | $67,019 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Old bridge vs Hancock
- In Old bridge, the population is higher at 28,094, compared to 857 in Hancock.
- Residents in Old bridge have a higher median age of 43.2 years compared to 35.9 years in Hancock.
- Old bridge has a higher median income of $104,712 compared to $67,019 in Hancock.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Old bridge at 48.0% compared to 40.0% in Hancock.
- The poverty level is identical in both Old bridge and Hancock at 5%.
- The unemployment rate in Old bridge is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.5% in Hancock.
Demographics
Demographics Old bridge vs Hancock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Old bridge | Hancock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 1 |
| White | 61 | 87 |
| Asian | 13 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Old bridge vs Hancock
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Old bridge at 4% compared to 1% in Hancock.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hancock at 87% compared to 61% in Old bridge.
- The Asian population is larger in Old bridge at 13% compared to 1% in Hancock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Old bridge at 16% compared to 6% in Hancock.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Old bridge at 6% compared to 4% in Hancock.
- In Hancock, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Old bridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Old bridge | Hancock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.3% | 14.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 19.8% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 11.4% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 20.9% |
| Obesity | 28.5% | 33.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Old bridge vs Hancock
- In Hancock, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.8% compared to 14.3% in Old bridge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hancock at 24.1% versus 19.8% in Old bridge.
- Hancock has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 11.4% in Old bridge.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hancock at 20.9% compared to 16.2% in Old bridge.
- Hancock has higher obesity rates at 33.6% compared to 28.5% in Old bridge.
- Disability percentages are higher in Old bridge at 11.0% compared to 6.0% in Hancock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Old bridge | Hancock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (302) | 0.5% (4) |
| High School Diploma | 18.8% (5,278) | 20.9% (179) |
| Less than High School | 8.2% (2,316) | 6.0% (51) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.2% (7,918) | 7.2% (62) |
Education Levels Comparison: Old bridge vs Hancock
- A higher percentage of residents in Old bridge have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.5% in Hancock.
- In Hancock, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.9% compared to 18.8% in Old bridge.
- More residents in Old bridge have less than a high school education at 8.2% compared to 6.0% in Hancock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Old bridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.2% compared to 7.2% in Hancock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.