Demographics details for Okeechobee, FL vs Sulphur, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Okeechobee, FL vs Sulphur, LA.
| Data | Okeechobee | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 40,412 | 20,342 |
| Median Age | 40.8 years | 38.9 years |
| Median Income | $50,476 | $53,606 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Okeechobee vs Sulphur
- In Okeechobee, the population is higher at 40,412, compared to 20,342 in Sulphur.
- Residents in Okeechobee have a higher median age of 40.8 years compared to 38.9 years in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher median income of $53,606, compared to $50,476 in Okeechobee.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Okeechobee at 38.0% compared to 36.0% in Sulphur.
- Okeechobee has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 15% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.7% in Okeechobee.
Demographics
Demographics Okeechobee vs Sulphur provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Okeechobee | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 9 |
| White | 58 | 83 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 26 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Okeechobee vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 8% in Okeechobee.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sulphur at 83% compared to 58% in Okeechobee.
- Both Okeechobee and Sulphur have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Okeechobee at 26% compared to 5% in Sulphur.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Okeechobee at 7% compared to 2% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Okeechobee and Sulphur at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Okeechobee | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 28.7% |
| Smoking | 23.7% | 21.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.4% | 20.6% |
| Obesity | 33.9% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Okeechobee vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 17.3% in Okeechobee.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sulphur at 28.7% versus 20.1% in Okeechobee.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Okeechobee at 23.7% compared to 21.3% in Sulphur.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sulphur at 20.6% compared to 15.4% in Okeechobee.
- Sulphur has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 33.9% in Okeechobee.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sulphur at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Okeechobee.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Okeechobee | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.9% (751) | 0.5% (93) |
| High School Diploma | 18.6% (7,520) | 24.2% (4,925) |
| Less than High School | 26.7% (10,783) | 19.3% (3,918) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.8% (4,773) | 11.7% (2,384) |
Education Levels Comparison: Okeechobee vs Sulphur
- A higher percentage of residents in Okeechobee have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.5% in Sulphur.
- In Sulphur, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.2% compared to 18.6% in Okeechobee.
- More residents in Okeechobee have less than a high school education at 26.7% compared to 19.3% in Sulphur.
- A higher percentage of residents in Okeechobee hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.8% compared to 11.7% in Sulphur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.