Demographics details for Okeechobee, FL vs Fort mill, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Okeechobee, FL vs Fort mill, SC.
| Data | Okeechobee | Fort mill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 40,412 | 30,940 |
| Median Age | 40.8 years | 36.7 years |
| Median Income | $50,476 | $128,125 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Okeechobee vs Fort mill
- In Okeechobee, the population is higher at 40,412, compared to 30,940 in Fort mill.
- Residents in Okeechobee have a higher median age of 40.8 years compared to 36.7 years in Fort mill.
- Fort mill has a higher median income of $128,125, compared to $50,476 in Okeechobee.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Okeechobee at 38.0% compared to 37.0% in Fort mill.
- Okeechobee has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 5% in Fort mill.
- Fort mill has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.7% in Okeechobee.
Demographics
Demographics Okeechobee vs Fort mill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Okeechobee | Fort mill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 9 |
| White | 58 | 79 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 26 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Okeechobee vs Fort mill
- In Fort mill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 8% in Okeechobee.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort mill at 79% compared to 58% in Okeechobee.
- In Fort mill, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Okeechobee.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Okeechobee at 26% compared to 5% in Fort mill.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Okeechobee at 7% compared to 4% in Fort mill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Okeechobee and Fort mill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Okeechobee | Fort mill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 21.1% |
| Smoking | 23.7% | 12.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.4% | 18.3% |
| Obesity | 33.9% | 31.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Okeechobee vs Fort mill
- More residents in Okeechobee report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 15.4% in Fort mill.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort mill at 21.1% versus 20.1% in Okeechobee.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Okeechobee at 23.7% compared to 12.3% in Fort mill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort mill at 18.3% compared to 15.4% in Okeechobee.
- Obesity rates are higher in Okeechobee at 33.9% compared to 31.6% in Fort mill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Okeechobee at 15.0% compared to 5.0% in Fort mill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Okeechobee | Fort mill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.9% (751) | 0.3% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 18.6% (7,520) | 7.7% (2,372) |
| Less than High School | 26.7% (10,783) | 2.8% (879) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.8% (4,773) | 30.0% (9,271) |
Education Levels Comparison: Okeechobee vs Fort mill
- A higher percentage of residents in Okeechobee have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.3% in Fort mill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Okeechobee hold a high school diploma at 18.6% compared to 7.7% in Fort mill.
- More residents in Okeechobee have less than a high school education at 26.7% compared to 2.8% in Fort mill.
- In Fort mill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.0% compared to 11.8% in Okeechobee.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.