Demographics details for Ohiopyle, PA vs Palos park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ohiopyle, PA vs Palos park, IL.
| Data | Ohiopyle | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 36 | 4,792 |
| Median Age | 53.2 years | 59.5 years |
| Median Income | $38,000 | $128,370 |
| Married Families | 81.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Ohiopyle vs Palos park
- The population in Palos park is higher at 4,792, compared to 36 in Ohiopyle.
- The median age in Palos park is higher at 59.5 years, compared to 53.2 years in Ohiopyle.
- Palos park has a higher median income of $128,370, compared to $38,000 in Ohiopyle.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ohiopyle at 81.0% compared to 60.0% in Palos park.
- The poverty level is identical in both Ohiopyle and Palos park at 0%.
- Palos park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.2% in Ohiopyle.
Demographics
Demographics Ohiopyle vs Palos park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ohiopyle | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 100 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 3 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ohiopyle vs Palos park
- In Palos park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Ohiopyle.
- Ohiopyle has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 88% in Palos park.
- In Palos park, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Ohiopyle.
- Palos park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Ohiopyle.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Palos park at 5%, compared to 0% in Ohiopyle.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ohiopyle and Palos park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ohiopyle | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 18.5% |
| Smoking | 23.2% | 11.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 20.8% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 26.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 44.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ohiopyle vs Palos park
- More residents in Ohiopyle report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 13.2% in Palos park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ohiopyle at 25.2% compared to 18.5% in Palos park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ohiopyle at 23.2% compared to 11.5% in Palos park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Palos park at 20.8% compared to 18.8% in Ohiopyle.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ohiopyle at 36.5% compared to 26.7% in Palos park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ohiopyle at 44.0% compared to 9.0% in Palos park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ohiopyle | Palos park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 27.8% (10) | 1.1% (54) |
| High School Diploma | 30.6% (11) | 18.2% (870) |
| Less than High School | 55.6% (20) | 6.0% (287) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.0% (9) | 42.1% (2,018) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ohiopyle vs Palos park
- A higher percentage of residents in Ohiopyle have no formal schooling at 27.8% compared to 1.1% in Palos park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ohiopyle hold a high school diploma at 30.6% compared to 18.2% in Palos park.
- More residents in Ohiopyle have less than a high school education at 55.6% compared to 6.0% in Palos park.
- In Palos park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.1% compared to 25.0% in Ohiopyle.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.