Environment details: Odessa MN
water quality is poor with high bacteria levels.
Environment details: Ridgefield CT
Good water quality, meets health standards.
Compare Environment: Odessa MN vs Ridgefield CT
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Odessa | Ridgefield |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 665 | 293 |
| Water Quality | 3/10 | 7/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | water quality is poor with high bacteria levels. | Good water quality, meets health standards. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.64 | 1.92 |
| Worst AQI | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 18 | 63 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Odessa vs Ridgefield
- The water quality in Ridgefield is superior at 7/10 compared to 3/10 in Odessa.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Ridgefield with an average index of 1.92 compared to 1.64 in Odessa.
- Ridgefield experiences more days with poor air quality at 63 compared to 18 in Odessa.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.