Demographics details for Odessa, MN vs Mc graw, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Odessa, MN vs Mc graw, NY.
Data | Odessa | Mc graw |
---|---|---|
Population | 104 | 994 |
Median Age | 49.4 years | 32.0 years |
Median Income | $46,875 | $60,781 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Odessa vs Mc graw
- The population in Mc graw is higher at 994, compared to 104 in Odessa.
- Residents in Odessa have a higher median age of 49.4 years compared to 32.0 years in Mc graw.
- Mc graw has a higher median income of $60,781, compared to $46,875 in Odessa.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Odessa and Mc graw at 38.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Mc graw at 7%, compared to 0% in Odessa.
- Mc graw has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.3% in Odessa.
Demographics
Demographics Odessa vs Mc graw provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Odessa | Mc graw |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 88 | 88 |
Asian | 12 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 4 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Odessa vs Mc graw
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Odessa and Mc graw at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Odessa and Mc graw at 88%.
- The Asian population is larger in Odessa at 12% compared to 0% in Mc graw.
- Mc graw has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 0% in Odessa.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mc graw at 8%, compared to 0% in Odessa.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Odessa and Mc graw at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Odessa | Mc graw |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 16.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 10.2% |
Depression | 22.5% | 25.5% |
Smoking | 17.9% | 18.6% |
Binge Drinking | 21.4% | 19.1% |
Obesity | 36.8% | 37.3% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Odessa vs Mc graw
- In Mc graw, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 14.7% in Odessa.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mc graw at 25.5% versus 22.5% in Odessa.
- Mc graw has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 17.9% in Odessa.
- Binge drinking is more common in Odessa at 21.4% compared to 19.1% in Mc graw.
- Mc graw has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 36.8% in Odessa.
- Disability percentages are higher in Odessa at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Mc graw.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Odessa | Mc graw |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.9% (2) | 0.3% (3) |
High School Diploma | 26.0% (27) | 27.1% (269) |
Less than High School | 13.5% (14) | 15.1% (150) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.0% (27) | 8.8% (87) |
Education Levels Comparison: Odessa vs Mc graw
- A higher percentage of residents in Odessa have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.3% in Mc graw.
- In Mc graw, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.1% compared to 26.0% in Odessa.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mc graw at 15.1%, compared to 13.5% in Odessa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Odessa hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.0% compared to 8.8% in Mc graw.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.