Demographics details for Oakley, CA vs Swainsboro, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Oakley, CA vs Swainsboro, GA.
Data | Oakley | Swainsboro |
---|---|---|
Population | 44,688 | 7,583 |
Median Age | 35.8 years | 30.1 years |
Median Income | $120,915 | $44,491 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 24% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.6 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Oakley vs Swainsboro
- In Oakley, the population is higher at 44,688, compared to 7,583 in Swainsboro.
- Residents in Oakley have a higher median age of 35.8 years compared to 30.1 years in Swainsboro.
- Oakley has a higher median income of $120,915 compared to $44,491 in Swainsboro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Oakley at 42.0% compared to 25.0% in Swainsboro.
- The poverty level is higher in Swainsboro at 24%, compared to 7% in Oakley.
- The unemployment rate in Oakley is higher at 5.6%, compared to 5.0% in Swainsboro.
Demographics
Demographics Oakley vs Swainsboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Oakley | Swainsboro |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 57 |
White | 38 | 33 |
Asian | 8 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 31 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 14 | 6 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Oakley vs Swainsboro
- In Swainsboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 57% compared to 8% in Oakley.
- Oakley has a higher percentage of White residents at 38% compared to 33% in Swainsboro.
- The Asian population is larger in Oakley at 8% compared to 0% in Swainsboro.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Oakley at 31% compared to 4% in Swainsboro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Oakley at 14% compared to 6% in Swainsboro.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Oakley at 1% compared to 0% in Swainsboro.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Oakley | Swainsboro |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 18.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 14.6% |
Depression | 18.5% | 20.6% |
Smoking | 12.0% | 22.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 13.6% |
Obesity | 27.3% | 42.6% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Oakley vs Swainsboro
- In Swainsboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 15.8% in Oakley.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Swainsboro at 20.6% versus 18.5% in Oakley.
- Swainsboro has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 12.0% in Oakley.
- Binge drinking is more common in Oakley at 17.5% compared to 13.6% in Swainsboro.
- Swainsboro has higher obesity rates at 42.6% compared to 27.3% in Oakley.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Swainsboro at 24.0% compared to 11.0% in Oakley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Oakley | Swainsboro |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (374) | 1.9% (147) |
High School Diploma | 15.8% (7,057) | 16.7% (1,264) |
Less than High School | 12.8% (5,710) | 11.6% (879) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (6,428) | 6.6% (500) |
Education Levels Comparison: Oakley vs Swainsboro
- In Swainsboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.8% in Oakley.
- In Swainsboro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.7% compared to 15.8% in Oakley.
- More residents in Oakley have less than a high school education at 12.8% compared to 11.6% in Swainsboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Oakley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 6.6% in Swainsboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.