Demographics details for Oakland, CA vs Ephrata, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Oakland, CA vs Ephrata, WA.
| Data | Oakland | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 430,553 | 8,476 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 33.4 years |
| Median Income | $94,389 | $57,958 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Oakland vs Ephrata
- In Oakland, the population is higher at 430,553, compared to 8,476 in Ephrata.
- Residents in Oakland have a higher median age of 37.5 years compared to 33.4 years in Ephrata.
- Oakland has a higher median income of $94,389 compared to $57,958 in Ephrata.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Oakland at 34.0% compared to 33.0% in Ephrata.
- Oakland has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 11% in Ephrata.
- The unemployment rate in Oakland is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.2% in Ephrata.
Demographics
Demographics Oakland vs Ephrata provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Oakland | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | 1 |
| White | 24 | 63 |
| Asian | 16 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 27 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Oakland vs Ephrata
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Oakland at 22% compared to 1% in Ephrata.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ephrata at 63% compared to 24% in Oakland.
- The Asian population is larger in Oakland at 16% compared to 0% in Ephrata.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Oakland at 27% compared to 25% in Ephrata.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ephrata at 11%, compared to 10% in Oakland.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Oakland at 1% compared to 0% in Ephrata.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Oakland | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 27.0% |
| Smoking | 12.0% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 30.5% | 35.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Oakland vs Ephrata
- In Ephrata, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 16.2% in Oakland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ephrata at 27.0% versus 17.8% in Oakland.
- Ephrata has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Oakland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ephrata at 17.6% compared to 14.7% in Oakland.
- Ephrata has higher obesity rates at 35.1% compared to 30.5% in Oakland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Oakland at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Oakland | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.1% (13,479) | 0.8% (65) |
| High School Diploma | 10.9% (46,896) | 17.7% (1,503) |
| Less than High School | 17.1% (73,435) | 14.4% (1,223) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.3% (156,333) | 8.0% (677) |
Education Levels Comparison: Oakland vs Ephrata
- A higher percentage of residents in Oakland have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.8% in Ephrata.
- In Ephrata, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.7% compared to 10.9% in Oakland.
- More residents in Oakland have less than a high school education at 17.1% compared to 14.4% in Ephrata.
- A higher percentage of residents in Oakland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.3% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.