Demographics details for Oakland park, FL vs Middle river, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Oakland park, FL vs Middle river, MD.
| Data | Oakland park | Middle river |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,824 | 31,155 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 36.7 years |
| Median Income | $64,989 | $72,970 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Oakland park vs Middle river
- In Oakland park, the population is higher at 43,824, compared to 31,155 in Middle river.
- Residents in Oakland park have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 36.7 years in Middle river.
- Middle river has a higher median income of $72,970, compared to $64,989 in Oakland park.
- In Middle river, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 30.0% in Oakland park.
- Oakland park has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 8% in Middle river.
- Middle river has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.1% in Oakland park.
Demographics
Demographics Oakland park vs Middle river provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Oakland park | Middle river |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 29 |
| White | 20 | 51 |
| Asian | 2 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 32 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Oakland park vs Middle river
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Oakland park and Middle river at 29%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Middle river at 51% compared to 20% in Oakland park.
- In Middle river, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 2% in Oakland park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Oakland park at 32% compared to 8% in Middle river.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Oakland park at 17% compared to 5% in Middle river.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Oakland park and Middle river at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Oakland park | Middle river |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 31.1% | 38.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Oakland park vs Middle river
- In Middle river, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.3% in Oakland park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Middle river at 24.1% versus 17.8% in Oakland park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Oakland park at 20.1% compared to 17.2% in Middle river.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Oakland park and Middle river at 15.0%.
- Middle river has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 31.1% in Oakland park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Middle river at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Oakland park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Oakland park | Middle river |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (596) | 2.6% (818) |
| High School Diploma | 19.8% (8,695) | 20.1% (6,254) |
| Less than High School | 16.2% (7,092) | 14.8% (4,616) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.7% (9,073) | 19.4% (6,048) |
Education Levels Comparison: Oakland park vs Middle river
- In Middle river, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 1.4% in Oakland park.
- In Middle river, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.1% compared to 19.8% in Oakland park.
- More residents in Oakland park have less than a high school education at 16.2% compared to 14.8% in Middle river.
- A higher percentage of residents in Oakland park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 19.4% in Middle river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.