Demographics details for Oakland park, FL vs Lanett, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Oakland park, FL vs Lanett, AL.
| Data | Oakland park | Lanett |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 43,824 | 6,759 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $64,989 | $48,125 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Oakland park vs Lanett
- In Oakland park, the population is higher at 43,824, compared to 6,759 in Lanett.
- The median age in Lanett is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 39.1 years in Oakland park.
- Oakland park has a higher median income of $64,989 compared to $48,125 in Lanett.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Oakland park at 30.0% compared to 24.0% in Lanett.
- Oakland park has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 0% in Lanett.
- Lanett has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 3.1% in Oakland park.
Demographics
Demographics Oakland park vs Lanett provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Oakland park | Lanett |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 73 |
| White | 20 | 16 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 32 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Oakland park vs Lanett
- In Lanett, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 29% in Oakland park.
- Oakland park has a higher percentage of White residents at 20% compared to 16% in Lanett.
- The Asian population is larger in Oakland park at 2% compared to 0% in Lanett.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Oakland park at 32% compared to 8% in Lanett.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Oakland park at 17% compared to 3% in Lanett.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Oakland park and Lanett at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Oakland park | Lanett |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 20.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 12.7% |
| Obesity | 31.1% | 46.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Oakland park vs Lanett
- In Lanett, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 16.3% in Oakland park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lanett at 22.1% versus 17.8% in Oakland park.
- Lanett has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 20.1% in Oakland park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Oakland park at 15.0% compared to 12.7% in Lanett.
- Lanett has higher obesity rates at 46.5% compared to 31.1% in Oakland park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lanett at 22.0% compared to 11.0% in Oakland park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Oakland park | Lanett |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (596) | 1.3% (90) |
| High School Diploma | 19.8% (8,695) | 18.9% (1,277) |
| Less than High School | 16.2% (7,092) | 20.3% (1,369) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.7% (9,073) | 7.4% (498) |
Education Levels Comparison: Oakland park vs Lanett
- A higher percentage of residents in Oakland park have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.3% in Lanett.
- A higher percentage of residents in Oakland park hold a high school diploma at 19.8% compared to 18.9% in Lanett.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lanett at 20.3%, compared to 16.2% in Oakland park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Oakland park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 7.4% in Lanett.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.