Demographics details for Oakland park, FL vs Gardena, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Oakland park, FL vs Gardena, CA.
Data | Oakland park | Gardena |
---|---|---|
Population | 43,824 | 58,843 |
Median Age | 39.1 years | 40.1 years |
Median Income | $64,989 | $75,443 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Oakland park vs Gardena
- The population in Gardena is higher at 58,843, compared to 43,824 in Oakland park.
- The median age in Gardena is higher at 40.1 years, compared to 39.1 years in Oakland park.
- Gardena has a higher median income of $75,443, compared to $64,989 in Oakland park.
- In Gardena, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 30.0% in Oakland park.
- The poverty level is higher in Gardena at 15%, compared to 14% in Oakland park.
- Gardena has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 3.1% in Oakland park.
Demographics
Demographics Oakland park vs Gardena provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Oakland park | Gardena |
---|---|---|
Black | 29 | 20 |
White | 20 | -5 |
Asian | 2 | 25 |
Hispanic | 32 | 44 |
Two or More Races | 17 | 15 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Oakland park vs Gardena
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Oakland park at 29% compared to 20% in Gardena.
- Oakland park has a higher percentage of White residents at 20% compared to -5% in Gardena.
- In Gardena, the Asian population stands at 25%, greater than 2% in Oakland park.
- Gardena has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 44%, compared to 32% in Oakland park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Oakland park at 17% compared to 15% in Gardena.
- In Gardena, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Oakland park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Oakland park | Gardena |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 10.9% |
Depression | 17.8% | 13.8% |
Smoking | 20.1% | 11.3% |
Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 13.5% |
Obesity | 31.1% | 28.1% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Oakland park vs Gardena
- More residents in Oakland park report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 15.0% in Gardena.
- Depression is more prevalent in Oakland park at 17.8% compared to 13.8% in Gardena.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Oakland park at 20.1% compared to 11.3% in Gardena.
- Binge drinking is more common in Oakland park at 15.0% compared to 13.5% in Gardena.
- Obesity rates are higher in Oakland park at 31.1% compared to 28.1% in Gardena.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gardena at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Oakland park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Oakland park | Gardena |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (596) | 3.0% (1,776) |
High School Diploma | 19.8% (8,695) | 15.0% (8,829) |
Less than High School | 16.2% (7,092) | 26.5% (15,605) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.7% (9,073) | 19.8% (11,669) |
Education Levels Comparison: Oakland park vs Gardena
- In Gardena, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.4% in Oakland park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Oakland park hold a high school diploma at 19.8% compared to 15.0% in Gardena.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gardena at 26.5%, compared to 16.2% in Oakland park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Oakland park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 19.8% in Gardena.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.