Demographics details for Oakland park, FL vs Clearfield, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Oakland park, FL vs Clearfield, UT.

Data Oakland park Clearfield
Population 43,824 34,062
Median Age 39.1 years 29.8 years
Median Income $64,989 $69,889
Married Families 30.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 14% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 4.3

Population Comparison: Oakland park vs Clearfield

  • In Oakland park, the population is higher at 43,824, compared to 34,062 in Clearfield.
  • Residents in Oakland park have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 29.8 years in Clearfield.
  • Clearfield has a higher median income of $69,889, compared to $64,989 in Oakland park.
  • In Clearfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 30.0% in Oakland park.
  • Oakland park has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Clearfield.
  • Clearfield has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.1% in Oakland park.

Demographics

Demographics Oakland park vs Clearfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Oakland park Clearfield
Black 29 3
White 20 69
Asian 2 2
Hispanic 32 17
Two or More Races 17 8
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Oakland park vs Clearfield

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Oakland park at 29% compared to 3% in Clearfield.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Clearfield at 69% compared to 20% in Oakland park.
  • Both Oakland park and Clearfield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Oakland park at 32% compared to 17% in Clearfield.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Oakland park at 17% compared to 8% in Clearfield.
  • In Clearfield, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Oakland park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Oakland park Clearfield
Mental Health Not Good 16.3% 17.4%
Physical Health Not Good 12.2% 11.7%
Depression 17.8% 24.6%
Smoking 20.1% 10.2%
Binge Drinking 15.0% 10.2%
Obesity 31.1% 36.3%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Oakland park vs Clearfield

  • In Clearfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 16.3% in Oakland park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Clearfield at 24.6% versus 17.8% in Oakland park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Oakland park at 20.1% compared to 10.2% in Clearfield.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Oakland park at 15.0% compared to 10.2% in Clearfield.
  • Clearfield has higher obesity rates at 36.3% compared to 31.1% in Oakland park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clearfield at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Oakland park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Oakland park Clearfield
No Schooling 1.4% (596) 0.6% (208)
High School Diploma 19.8% (8,695) 13.8% (4,690)
Less than High School 16.2% (7,092) 10.7% (3,633)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.7% (9,073) 12.8% (4,366)

Education Levels Comparison: Oakland park vs Clearfield

  • A higher percentage of residents in Oakland park have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.6% in Clearfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Oakland park hold a high school diploma at 19.8% compared to 13.8% in Clearfield.
  • More residents in Oakland park have less than a high school education at 16.2% compared to 10.7% in Clearfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Oakland park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 12.8% in Clearfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.