Demographics details for Oakland park, FL vs Boomer, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Oakland park, FL vs Boomer, NC.
Data | Oakland park | Boomer |
---|---|---|
Population | 43,824 | 1,213 |
Median Age | 39.1 years | 53.9 years |
Median Income | $64,989 | $50,367 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Oakland park vs Boomer
- In Oakland park, the population is higher at 43,824, compared to 1,213 in Boomer.
- The median age in Boomer is higher at 53.9 years, compared to 39.1 years in Oakland park.
- Oakland park has a higher median income of $64,989 compared to $50,367 in Boomer.
- In Boomer, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 30.0% in Oakland park.
- Oakland park has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 12% in Boomer.
- Boomer has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.1% in Oakland park.
Demographics
Demographics Oakland park vs Boomer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Oakland park | Boomer |
---|---|---|
Black | 29 | 5 |
White | 20 | 91 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 32 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 17 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Oakland park vs Boomer
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Oakland park at 29% compared to 5% in Boomer.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Boomer at 91% compared to 20% in Oakland park.
- The Asian population is larger in Oakland park at 2% compared to 0% in Boomer.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Oakland park at 32% compared to 2% in Boomer.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Oakland park at 17% compared to 2% in Boomer.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Oakland park and Boomer at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Oakland park | Boomer |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 17.8% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 20.1% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 15.0% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 31.1% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Oakland park vs Boomer
- More residents in Oakland park report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Depression is more prevalent in Oakland park at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Oakland park at 20.1% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Binge drinking is more common in Oakland park at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- Obesity rates are higher in Oakland park at 31.1% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Boomer at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Oakland park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Oakland park | Boomer |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (596) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 19.8% (8,695) | 21.2% (257) |
Less than High School | 16.2% (7,092) | 25.9% (314) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.7% (9,073) | 9.6% (116) |
Education Levels Comparison: Oakland park vs Boomer
- A higher percentage of residents in Oakland park have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Boomer.
- In Boomer, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.2% compared to 19.8% in Oakland park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Boomer at 25.9%, compared to 16.2% in Oakland park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Oakland park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 9.6% in Boomer.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.