Demographics details for Oakland park, FL vs Ashfield, MA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Oakland park, FL vs Ashfield, MA.

Data Oakland park Ashfield
Population 43,824 1,734
Median Age 39.1 years 45.0 years
Median Income $64,989 $76,000
Married Families 30.0% 70.0%
Poverty Level 14% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 3.0

Population Comparison: Oakland park vs Ashfield

  • In Oakland park, the population is higher at 43,824, compared to 1,734 in Ashfield.
  • The median age in Ashfield is higher at 45.0 years, compared to 39.1 years in Oakland park.
  • Ashfield has a higher median income of $76,000, compared to $64,989 in Oakland park.
  • In Ashfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 70.0%, compared to 30.0% in Oakland park.
  • Oakland park has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 8% in Ashfield.
  • The unemployment rate in Oakland park is higher at 3.1%, compared to 3.0% in Ashfield.

Demographics

Demographics Oakland park vs Ashfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Oakland park Ashfield
Black 29 Data is updating
White 20 97.5
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 32 1.5
Two or More Races 17 1
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Oakland park vs Ashfield

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Oakland park at 29% compared to 0% in Ashfield.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Ashfield at 97.5% compared to 20% in Oakland park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Oakland park at 2% compared to 0% in Ashfield.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Oakland park at 32% compared to 1.5% in Ashfield.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Oakland park at 17% compared to 1% in Ashfield.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Oakland park and Ashfield at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Oakland park Ashfield
Mental Health Not Good 16.3% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 12.2% Data is updating%
Depression 17.8% Data is updating%
Smoking 20.1% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 15.0% Data is updating%
Obesity 31.1% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 11.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Oakland park vs Ashfield

  • More residents in Oakland park report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Oakland park at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Oakland park at 20.1% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Oakland park at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Oakland park at 31.1% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Oakland park at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Oakland park Ashfield
No Schooling 1.4% (596) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 19.8% (8,695) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 16.2% (7,092) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.7% (9,073) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Oakland park vs Ashfield

  • A higher percentage of residents in Oakland park have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Oakland park hold a high school diploma at 19.8% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
  • More residents in Oakland park have less than a high school education at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Oakland park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.