Demographics details for Oakdale, LA vs Cranston, RI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Oakdale, LA vs Cranston, RI.
| Data | Oakdale | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,520 | 82,421 |
| Median Age | 42.1 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $46,250 | $83,123 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Oakdale vs Cranston
- The population in Cranston is higher at 82,421, compared to 6,520 in Oakdale.
- Residents in Oakdale have a higher median age of 42.1 years compared to 39.9 years in Cranston.
- Cranston has a higher median income of $83,123, compared to $46,250 in Oakdale.
- In Cranston, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 33.0% in Oakdale.
- Oakdale has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 8% in Cranston.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Oakdale and Cranston at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Oakdale vs Cranston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Oakdale | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 30 | 5 |
| White | 47 | 61 |
| Asian | 1 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 9 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Oakdale vs Cranston
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Oakdale at 30% compared to 5% in Cranston.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cranston at 61% compared to 47% in Oakdale.
- In Cranston, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Oakdale.
- Cranston has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 17% in Oakdale.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cranston at 9%, compared to 3% in Oakdale.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Oakdale at 2% compared to 0% in Cranston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Oakdale | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 23.4% | 13.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 18.6% |
| Obesity | 41.6% | 29.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Oakdale vs Cranston
- More residents in Oakdale report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 15.1% in Cranston.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cranston at 24.9% versus 24.3% in Oakdale.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Oakdale at 23.4% compared to 13.5% in Cranston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Oakdale at 19.2% compared to 18.6% in Cranston.
- Obesity rates are higher in Oakdale at 41.6% compared to 29.8% in Cranston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Oakdale at 21.0% compared to 12.0% in Cranston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Oakdale | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (65) | 1.1% (930) |
| High School Diploma | 25.8% (1,683) | 16.1% (13,246) |
| Less than High School | 37.3% (2,435) | 13.4% (11,048) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.1% (528) | 24.7% (20,330) |
Education Levels Comparison: Oakdale vs Cranston
- In Cranston, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 1.0% in Oakdale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Oakdale hold a high school diploma at 25.8% compared to 16.1% in Cranston.
- More residents in Oakdale have less than a high school education at 37.3% compared to 13.4% in Cranston.
- In Cranston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 8.1% in Oakdale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.