Demographics details for Oak park, IL vs Paupack, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Oak park, IL vs Paupack, PA.
| Data | Oak park | Paupack |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 52,553 | 1,000 |
| Median Age | 40.3 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $103,264 | $60,000 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 300.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Oak park vs Paupack
- In Oak park, the population is higher at 52,553, compared to 1,000 in Paupack.
- The median age in Paupack is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 40.3 years in Oak park.
- Oak park has a higher median income of $103,264 compared to $60,000 in Paupack.
- In Paupack, the percentage of married families is higher at 300.0%, compared to 40.0% in Oak park.
- The poverty level is higher in Paupack at 8%, compared to 5% in Oak park.
- The unemployment rate in Oak park is higher at 5.7%, compared to 4.0% in Paupack.
Demographics
Demographics Oak park vs Paupack provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Oak park | Paupack |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | 2 |
| White | 57 | 90 |
| Asian | 6 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Oak park vs Paupack
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Oak park at 19% compared to 2% in Paupack.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Paupack at 90% compared to 57% in Oak park.
- The Asian population is larger in Oak park at 6% compared to 5% in Paupack.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Oak park at 9% compared to 3% in Paupack.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Oak park at 9% compared to 0% in Paupack.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Oak park and Paupack at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Oak park | Paupack |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 11.8% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.5% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 16.2% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 8.8% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.7% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 27.2% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Oak park vs Paupack
- More residents in Oak park report poor mental health at 11.8% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- Depression is more prevalent in Oak park at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Oak park at 8.8% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- Binge drinking is more common in Oak park at 18.7% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- Obesity rates are higher in Oak park at 27.2% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- Disability percentages are higher in Oak park at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Oak park | Paupack |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (115) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 5.4% (2,820) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 2.9% (1,544) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 51.9% (27,273) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Oak park vs Paupack
- A higher percentage of residents in Oak park have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- A higher percentage of residents in Oak park hold a high school diploma at 5.4% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- More residents in Oak park have less than a high school education at 2.9% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
- A higher percentage of residents in Oak park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 51.9% compared to 0.0% in Paupack.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.