Demographics details for Oak harbor, WA vs Thornton, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Oak harbor, WA vs Thornton, CO.
| Data | Oak harbor | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,403 | 143,282 |
| Median Age | 31.7 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $68,039 | $95,064 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Oak harbor vs Thornton
- The population in Thornton is higher at 143,282, compared to 24,403 in Oak harbor.
- The median age in Thornton is higher at 33.7 years, compared to 31.7 years in Oak harbor.
- Thornton has a higher median income of $95,064, compared to $68,039 in Oak harbor.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Oak harbor at 43.0% compared to 40.0% in Thornton.
- The poverty level is higher in Thornton at 9%, compared to 7% in Oak harbor.
- The unemployment rate in Oak harbor is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Thornton.
Demographics
Demographics Oak harbor vs Thornton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Oak harbor | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 2 |
| White | 56 | 39 |
| Asian | 8 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 37 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 15 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Oak harbor vs Thornton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Oak harbor at 5% compared to 2% in Thornton.
- Oak harbor has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 39% in Thornton.
- The Asian population is larger in Oak harbor at 8% compared to 6% in Thornton.
- Thornton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 16% in Oak harbor.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Thornton at 15%, compared to 14% in Oak harbor.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Oak harbor and Thornton at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Oak harbor | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 15.1% | 15.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 21.0% |
| Obesity | 31.5% | 30.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Oak harbor vs Thornton
- More residents in Oak harbor report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 15.1% in Thornton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Oak harbor at 25.0% compared to 22.0% in Thornton.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Oak harbor and Thornton at 15.1%.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Thornton at 21.0% compared to 16.2% in Oak harbor.
- Obesity rates are higher in Oak harbor at 31.5% compared to 30.1% in Thornton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Oak harbor at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Thornton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Oak harbor | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (106) | 1.7% (2,448) |
| High School Diploma | 12.8% (3,133) | 13.2% (18,983) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (1,395) | 14.7% (20,999) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.6% (4,288) | 19.3% (27,712) |
Education Levels Comparison: Oak harbor vs Thornton
- In Thornton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.4% in Oak harbor.
- In Thornton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.2% compared to 12.8% in Oak harbor.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Thornton at 14.7%, compared to 5.7% in Oak harbor.
- In Thornton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 17.6% in Oak harbor.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.