Demographics details for Oak harbor, WA vs Seaside park, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Oak harbor, WA vs Seaside park, NJ.
Data | Oak harbor | Seaside park |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,403 | 1,473 |
Median Age | 31.7 years | 59.5 years |
Median Income | $68,039 | $80,658 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 57.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Oak harbor vs Seaside park
- In Oak harbor, the population is higher at 24,403, compared to 1,473 in Seaside park.
- The median age in Seaside park is higher at 59.5 years, compared to 31.7 years in Oak harbor.
- Seaside park has a higher median income of $80,658, compared to $68,039 in Oak harbor.
- In Seaside park, the percentage of married families is higher at 57.0%, compared to 43.0% in Oak harbor.
- Oak harbor has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 5% in Seaside park.
- The unemployment rate in Oak harbor is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.1% in Seaside park.
Demographics
Demographics Oak harbor vs Seaside park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Oak harbor | Seaside park |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 3 |
White | 56 | 90 |
Asian | 8 | 4 |
Hispanic | 16 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 14 | 2 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Oak harbor vs Seaside park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Oak harbor at 5% compared to 3% in Seaside park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Seaside park at 90% compared to 56% in Oak harbor.
- The Asian population is larger in Oak harbor at 8% compared to 4% in Seaside park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Oak harbor at 16% compared to 1% in Seaside park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Oak harbor at 14% compared to 2% in Seaside park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Oak harbor at 1% compared to 0% in Seaside park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Oak harbor | Seaside park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 15.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 10.1% |
Depression | 25.0% | 23.1% |
Smoking | 15.1% | 13.2% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 18.2% |
Obesity | 31.5% | 30.7% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Oak harbor vs Seaside park
- More residents in Oak harbor report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 15.4% in Seaside park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Oak harbor at 25.0% compared to 23.1% in Seaside park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Oak harbor at 15.1% compared to 13.2% in Seaside park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Seaside park at 18.2% compared to 16.2% in Oak harbor.
- Obesity rates are higher in Oak harbor at 31.5% compared to 30.7% in Seaside park.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Oak harbor and Seaside park at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Oak harbor | Seaside park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (106) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 12.8% (3,133) | 22.2% (327) |
Less than High School | 5.7% (1,395) | 3.3% (49) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.6% (4,288) | 56.3% (830) |
Education Levels Comparison: Oak harbor vs Seaside park
- A higher percentage of residents in Oak harbor have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Seaside park.
- In Seaside park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.2% compared to 12.8% in Oak harbor.
- More residents in Oak harbor have less than a high school education at 5.7% compared to 3.3% in Seaside park.
- In Seaside park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 56.3% compared to 17.6% in Oak harbor.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.