Demographics details for Oak harbor, WA vs Clayton, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Oak harbor, WA vs Clayton, OK.
| Data | Oak harbor | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,403 | 555 |
| Median Age | 31.7 years | 32.7 years |
| Median Income | $68,039 | $27,083 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Oak harbor vs Clayton
- In Oak harbor, the population is higher at 24,403, compared to 555 in Clayton.
- The median age in Clayton is higher at 32.7 years, compared to 31.7 years in Oak harbor.
- Oak harbor has a higher median income of $68,039 compared to $27,083 in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Oak harbor at 43.0% compared to 31.0% in Clayton.
- Oak harbor has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 0% in Clayton.
- The unemployment rate in Oak harbor is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Oak harbor vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Oak harbor | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 2 |
| White | 56 | 51 |
| Asian | 8 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 23 |
| American Indian | 1 | 20 |
Demographics Comparison: Oak harbor vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Oak harbor at 5% compared to 2% in Clayton.
- Oak harbor has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 51% in Clayton.
- The Asian population is larger in Oak harbor at 8% compared to 0% in Clayton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Oak harbor at 16% compared to 4% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clayton at 23%, compared to 14% in Oak harbor.
- In Clayton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 20%, compared to 1% in Oak harbor.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Oak harbor | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 21.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 15.6% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 28.8% |
| Smoking | 15.1% | 26.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 31.5% | 40.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 37.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Oak harbor vs Clayton
- In Clayton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 17.3% in Oak harbor.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clayton at 28.8% versus 25.0% in Oak harbor.
- Clayton has a higher smoking rate at 26.6% compared to 15.1% in Oak harbor.
- Binge drinking is more common in Oak harbor at 16.2% compared to 14.4% in Clayton.
- Clayton has higher obesity rates at 40.2% compared to 31.5% in Oak harbor.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clayton at 37.0% compared to 13.0% in Oak harbor.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Oak harbor | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (106) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.8% (3,133) | 37.5% (208) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (1,395) | 19.5% (108) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.6% (4,288) | 6.7% (37) |
Education Levels Comparison: Oak harbor vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of residents in Oak harbor have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 37.5% compared to 12.8% in Oak harbor.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clayton at 19.5%, compared to 5.7% in Oak harbor.
- A higher percentage of residents in Oak harbor hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.6% compared to 6.7% in Clayton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.