Demographics details for Oak harbor, OH vs San francisco, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Oak harbor, OH vs San francisco, CA.

Data Oak harbor San francisco
Population 2,797 808,437
Median Age 37.9 years 39.3 years
Median Income $50,362 $136,689
Married Families 31.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 8% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.6

Population Comparison: Oak harbor vs San francisco

  • The population in San francisco is higher at 808,437, compared to 2,797 in Oak harbor.
  • The median age in San francisco is higher at 39.3 years, compared to 37.9 years in Oak harbor.
  • San francisco has a higher median income of $136,689, compared to $50,362 in Oak harbor.
  • In San francisco, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 31.0% in Oak harbor.
  • The poverty level is higher in San francisco at 12%, compared to 8% in Oak harbor.
  • The unemployment rate in Oak harbor is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.6% in San francisco.

Demographics

Demographics Oak harbor vs San francisco provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Oak harbor San francisco
Black Data is updating 5
White 94 31
Asian 1 37
Hispanic 4 16
Two or More Races 1 10
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Oak harbor vs San francisco

  • In San francisco, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Oak harbor.
  • Oak harbor has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 31% in San francisco.
  • In San francisco, the Asian population stands at 37%, greater than 1% in Oak harbor.
  • San francisco has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 4% in Oak harbor.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San francisco at 10%, compared to 1% in Oak harbor.
  • In San francisco, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Oak harbor.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Oak harbor San francisco
Mental Health Not Good 18.4% 13.4%
Physical Health Not Good 12.3% 8.4%
Depression 25.1% 15.7%
Smoking 21.7% 9.2%
Binge Drinking 18.4% 16.4%
Obesity 38.9% 19.1%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Oak harbor vs San francisco

  • More residents in Oak harbor report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 13.4% in San francisco.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Oak harbor at 25.1% compared to 15.7% in San francisco.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Oak harbor at 21.7% compared to 9.2% in San francisco.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Oak harbor at 18.4% compared to 16.4% in San francisco.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Oak harbor at 38.9% compared to 19.1% in San francisco.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Oak harbor at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in San francisco.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Oak harbor San francisco
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 3.0% (23,928)
High School Diploma 19.1% (534) 8.5% (68,418)
Less than High School 4.6% (130) 12.4% (99,947)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.3% (372) 50.3% (406,774)

Education Levels Comparison: Oak harbor vs San francisco

  • In San francisco, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.0% in Oak harbor.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Oak harbor hold a high school diploma at 19.1% compared to 8.5% in San francisco.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San francisco at 12.4%, compared to 4.6% in Oak harbor.
  • In San francisco, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.3% compared to 13.3% in Oak harbor.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.