Demographics details for Novinger, MO vs Parker, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Novinger, MO vs Parker, SD.
| Data | Novinger | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 380 | 1,221 |
| Median Age | 30.1 years | 39.3 years |
| Median Income | $48,125 | $83,864 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 2.0 |
Population Comparison: Novinger vs Parker
- The population in Parker is higher at 1,221, compared to 380 in Novinger.
- The median age in Parker is higher at 39.3 years, compared to 30.1 years in Novinger.
- Parker has a higher median income of $83,864, compared to $48,125 in Novinger.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Novinger at 47.0% compared to 39.0% in Parker.
- Novinger has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 5% in Parker.
- The unemployment rate in Novinger is higher at 3.2%, compared to 2.0% in Parker.
Demographics
Demographics Novinger vs Parker provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Novinger | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 78 | 85 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 15 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Novinger vs Parker
- In Parker, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Novinger.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Parker at 85% compared to 78% in Novinger.
- Both Novinger and Parker have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Novinger at 15% compared to 5% in Parker.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Novinger at 7% compared to 4% in Parker.
- In Parker, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Novinger.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Novinger | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 13.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 21.1% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 20.4% |
| Obesity | 35.8% | 34.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Novinger vs Parker
- More residents in Novinger report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 13.5% in Parker.
- Depression is more prevalent in Novinger at 26.3% compared to 17.8% in Parker.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Novinger at 21.1% compared to 16.4% in Parker.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Parker at 20.4% compared to 17.4% in Novinger.
- Obesity rates are higher in Novinger at 35.8% compared to 34.4% in Parker.
- Disability percentages are higher in Novinger at 21.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Novinger | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (7) | 0.2% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 35.8% (136) | 17.9% (218) |
| Less than High School | 27.6% (105) | 13.0% (159) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.3% (24) | 12.9% (158) |
Education Levels Comparison: Novinger vs Parker
- A higher percentage of residents in Novinger have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.2% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Novinger hold a high school diploma at 35.8% compared to 17.9% in Parker.
- More residents in Novinger have less than a high school education at 27.6% compared to 13.0% in Parker.
- In Parker, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.9% compared to 6.3% in Novinger.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.