Demographics details for Norway, MI vs Torrance, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Norway, MI vs Torrance, CA.
| Data | Norway | Torrance |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,827 | 141,126 |
| Median Age | 45.3 years | 42.9 years |
| Median Income | $49,261 | $109,554 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Norway vs Torrance
- The population in Torrance is higher at 141,126, compared to 2,827 in Norway.
- Residents in Norway have a higher median age of 45.3 years compared to 42.9 years in Torrance.
- Torrance has a higher median income of $109,554, compared to $49,261 in Norway.
- In Torrance, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 38.0% in Norway.
- Norway has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 8% in Torrance.
- Torrance has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 4.5% in Norway.
Demographics
Demographics Norway vs Torrance provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Norway | Torrance |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 96 | 25 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 39 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Norway vs Torrance
- In Torrance, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Norway.
- Norway has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 25% in Torrance.
- In Torrance, the Asian population stands at 39%, greater than 0% in Norway.
- Torrance has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 0% in Norway.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Torrance at 12%, compared to 3% in Norway.
- In Torrance, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Norway.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Norway | Torrance |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 12.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 8.0% |
| Depression | 25.7% | 14.0% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 7.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 21.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Norway vs Torrance
- More residents in Norway report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 12.7% in Torrance.
- Depression is more prevalent in Norway at 25.7% compared to 14.0% in Torrance.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Norway at 16.4% compared to 7.9% in Torrance.
- Binge drinking is more common in Norway at 19.1% compared to 15.0% in Torrance.
- Obesity rates are higher in Norway at 34.9% compared to 21.4% in Torrance.
- Disability percentages are higher in Norway at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Torrance.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Norway | Torrance |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.1% (1,535) |
| High School Diploma | 21.9% (618) | 11.4% (16,056) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (329) | 5.9% (8,337) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (346) | 39.6% (55,843) |
Education Levels Comparison: Norway vs Torrance
- In Torrance, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Norway.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norway hold a high school diploma at 21.9% compared to 11.4% in Torrance.
- More residents in Norway have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 5.9% in Torrance.
- In Torrance, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.6% compared to 12.2% in Norway.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.