Demographics details for Norway, MI vs Jasper, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Norway, MI vs Jasper, AL.
| Data | Norway | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,827 | 14,338 |
| Median Age | 45.3 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $49,261 | $62,850 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Norway vs Jasper
- The population in Jasper is higher at 14,338, compared to 2,827 in Norway.
- Residents in Norway have a higher median age of 45.3 years compared to 35.4 years in Jasper.
- Jasper has a higher median income of $62,850, compared to $49,261 in Norway.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Norway at 38.0% compared to 36.0% in Jasper.
- The poverty level is identical in both Norway and Jasper at 15%.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Norway and Jasper at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Norway vs Jasper provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Norway | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 10 |
| White | 96 | 81 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Norway vs Jasper
- In Jasper, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 1% in Norway.
- Norway has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 81% in Jasper.
- Both Norway and Jasper have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Jasper has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Norway.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Jasper at 4%, compared to 3% in Norway.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Norway and Jasper at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Norway | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 25.7% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 19.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 38.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Norway vs Jasper
- In Jasper, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 16.9% in Norway.
- Depression is more prevalent in Norway at 25.7% compared to 24.0% in Jasper.
- Jasper has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 16.4% in Norway.
- Binge drinking is more common in Norway at 19.1% compared to 15.1% in Jasper.
- Jasper has higher obesity rates at 38.2% compared to 34.9% in Norway.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jasper at 19.0% compared to 18.0% in Norway.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Norway | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (69) |
| High School Diploma | 21.9% (618) | 14.6% (2,098) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (329) | 12.9% (1,856) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (346) | 16.3% (2,338) |
Education Levels Comparison: Norway vs Jasper
- In Jasper, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Norway.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norway hold a high school diploma at 21.9% compared to 14.6% in Jasper.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jasper at 12.9%, compared to 11.6% in Norway.
- In Jasper, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 12.2% in Norway.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.