Demographics details for Norway, MI vs Holcomb, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Norway, MI vs Holcomb, KS.
Data | Norway | Holcomb |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,827 | 2,199 |
Median Age | 45.3 years | 29.8 years |
Median Income | $49,261 | $81,111 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Population Comparison: Norway vs Holcomb
- In Norway, the population is higher at 2,827, compared to 2,199 in Holcomb.
- Residents in Norway have a higher median age of 45.3 years compared to 29.8 years in Holcomb.
- Holcomb has a higher median income of $81,111, compared to $49,261 in Norway.
- In Holcomb, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 38.0% in Norway.
- Norway has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Holcomb.
- The unemployment rate in Norway is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.0% in Holcomb.
Demographics
Demographics Norway vs Holcomb provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Norway | Holcomb |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 96 | 36 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 45 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 17 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Norway vs Holcomb
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Norway at 1% compared to 0% in Holcomb.
- Norway has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 36% in Holcomb.
- In Holcomb, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Norway.
- Holcomb has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 45%, compared to 0% in Norway.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Holcomb at 17%, compared to 3% in Norway.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Norway and Holcomb at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Norway | Holcomb |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 14.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 10.5% |
Depression | 25.7% | 19.0% |
Smoking | 16.4% | 17.1% |
Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 19.5% |
Obesity | 34.9% | 36.9% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Norway vs Holcomb
- More residents in Norway report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 14.9% in Holcomb.
- Depression is more prevalent in Norway at 25.7% compared to 19.0% in Holcomb.
- Holcomb has a higher smoking rate at 17.1% compared to 16.4% in Norway.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Holcomb at 19.5% compared to 19.1% in Norway.
- Holcomb has higher obesity rates at 36.9% compared to 34.9% in Norway.
- Disability percentages are higher in Norway at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Holcomb.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Norway | Holcomb |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.1% (25) |
High School Diploma | 21.9% (618) | 15.5% (340) |
Less than High School | 11.6% (329) | 21.8% (479) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (346) | 8.5% (188) |
Education Levels Comparison: Norway vs Holcomb
- In Holcomb, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Norway.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norway hold a high school diploma at 21.9% compared to 15.5% in Holcomb.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Holcomb at 21.8%, compared to 11.6% in Norway.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norway hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 8.5% in Holcomb.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.