Demographics details for Norway, MI vs Fond du lac, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Norway, MI vs Fond du lac, WI.
Data | Norway | Fond du lac |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,827 | 44,339 |
Median Age | 45.3 years | 37.9 years |
Median Income | $49,261 | $58,675 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Norway vs Fond du lac
- The population in Fond du lac is higher at 44,339, compared to 2,827 in Norway.
- Residents in Norway have a higher median age of 45.3 years compared to 37.9 years in Fond du lac.
- Fond du lac has a higher median income of $58,675, compared to $49,261 in Norway.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Norway at 38.0% compared to 36.0% in Fond du lac.
- Norway has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 8% in Fond du lac.
- The unemployment rate in Norway is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Fond du lac.
Demographics
Demographics Norway vs Fond du lac provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Norway | Fond du lac |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 3 |
White | 96 | 81 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Norway vs Fond du lac
- In Fond du lac, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Norway.
- Norway has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 81% in Fond du lac.
- In Fond du lac, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Norway.
- Fond du lac has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Norway.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fond du lac at 5%, compared to 3% in Norway.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Norway and Fond du lac at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Norway | Fond du lac |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 15.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 10.5% |
Depression | 25.7% | 23.7% |
Smoking | 16.4% | 16.5% |
Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 23.0% |
Obesity | 34.9% | 41.1% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Norway vs Fond du lac
- More residents in Norway report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.6% in Fond du lac.
- Depression is more prevalent in Norway at 25.7% compared to 23.7% in Fond du lac.
- Fond du lac has a higher smoking rate at 16.5% compared to 16.4% in Norway.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fond du lac at 23.0% compared to 19.1% in Norway.
- Fond du lac has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 34.9% in Norway.
- Disability percentages are higher in Norway at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Fond du lac.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Norway | Fond du lac |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.8% (370) |
High School Diploma | 21.9% (618) | 20.6% (9,143) |
Less than High School | 11.6% (329) | 11.8% (5,248) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (346) | 14.5% (6,416) |
Education Levels Comparison: Norway vs Fond du lac
- In Fond du lac, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Norway.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norway hold a high school diploma at 21.9% compared to 20.6% in Fond du lac.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fond du lac at 11.8%, compared to 11.6% in Norway.
- In Fond du lac, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.5% compared to 12.2% in Norway.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.