Demographics details for Norway, MI vs Circleville, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Norway, MI vs Circleville, NY.
Data | Norway | Circleville |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,827 | 4,400 |
Median Age | 45.3 years | 38.0 years |
Median Income | $49,261 | $85,000 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 65.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Norway vs Circleville
- The population in Circleville is higher at 4,400, compared to 2,827 in Norway.
- Residents in Norway have a higher median age of 45.3 years compared to 38.0 years in Circleville.
- Circleville has a higher median income of $85,000, compared to $49,261 in Norway.
- In Circleville, the percentage of married families is higher at 65.0%, compared to 38.0% in Norway.
- Norway has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Circleville.
- The unemployment rate in Norway is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Circleville.
Demographics
Demographics Norway vs Circleville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Norway | Circleville |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 5 |
White | 96 | 85 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 5 |
Two or More Races | 3 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Norway vs Circleville
- In Circleville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Norway.
- Norway has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 85% in Circleville.
- In Circleville, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Norway.
- Circleville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Norway.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Norway at 3% compared to 0% in Circleville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Norway and Circleville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Norway | Circleville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 25.7% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 16.4% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 19.1% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 34.9% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Norway vs Circleville
- More residents in Norway report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in Circleville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Norway at 25.7% compared to 0.0% in Circleville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Norway at 16.4% compared to 0.0% in Circleville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Norway at 19.1% compared to 0.0% in Circleville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Norway at 34.9% compared to 0.0% in Circleville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Norway at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Circleville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Norway | Circleville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 21.9% (618) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 11.6% (329) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (346) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Norway vs Circleville
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Norway and Circleville at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norway hold a high school diploma at 21.9% compared to 0.0% in Circleville.
- More residents in Norway have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 0.0% in Circleville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norway hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 0.0% in Circleville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.