Demographics details for Norway, IA vs Pasadena, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Norway, IA vs Pasadena, TX.
| Data | Norway | Pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 466 | 147,662 |
| Median Age | 48.3 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $90,000 | $64,698 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Norway vs Pasadena
- The population in Pasadena is higher at 147,662, compared to 466 in Norway.
- Residents in Norway have a higher median age of 48.3 years compared to 32.6 years in Pasadena.
- Norway has a higher median income of $90,000 compared to $64,698 in Pasadena.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Norway at 51.0% compared to 37.0% in Pasadena.
- The poverty level is higher in Pasadena at 12%, compared to 0% in Norway.
- Pasadena has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 2.5% in Norway.
Demographics
Demographics Norway vs Pasadena provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Norway | Pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 100 | -1 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 72 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 23 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Norway vs Pasadena
- In Pasadena, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Norway.
- Norway has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to -1% in Pasadena.
- In Pasadena, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Norway.
- Pasadena has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 72%, compared to 0% in Norway.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pasadena at 23%, compared to 0% in Norway.
- In Pasadena, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Norway.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Norway | Pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 17.5% | 21.7% |
| Smoking | 14.7% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.9% | 18.1% |
| Obesity | 36.8% | 37.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Norway vs Pasadena
- In Pasadena, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 14.2% in Norway.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pasadena at 21.7% versus 17.5% in Norway.
- Pasadena has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 14.7% in Norway.
- Binge drinking is more common in Norway at 22.9% compared to 18.1% in Pasadena.
- Pasadena has higher obesity rates at 37.9% compared to 36.8% in Norway.
- Disability percentages are higher in Norway at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Pasadena.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Norway | Pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 3.0% (4,357) |
| High School Diploma | 33.5% (156) | 16.2% (23,948) |
| Less than High School | 5.6% (26) | 33.1% (48,806) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.5% (49) | 9.9% (14,596) |
Education Levels Comparison: Norway vs Pasadena
- In Pasadena, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.0% in Norway.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norway hold a high school diploma at 33.5% compared to 16.2% in Pasadena.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pasadena at 33.1%, compared to 5.6% in Norway.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norway hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.5% compared to 9.9% in Pasadena.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.