Demographics details for Norton, KS vs Sterling heights, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Norton, KS vs Sterling heights, MI.

Data Norton Sterling heights
Population 5,301 132,567
Median Age 40.4 years 41.2 years
Median Income $52,710 $75,381
Married Families 37.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 10% 8%
Unemployment Rate 2.8 4.7

Population Comparison: Norton vs Sterling heights

  • The population in Sterling heights is higher at 132,567, compared to 5,301 in Norton.
  • The median age in Sterling heights is higher at 41.2 years, compared to 40.4 years in Norton.
  • Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381, compared to $52,710 in Norton.
  • In Sterling heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 37.0% in Norton.
  • Norton has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 2.8% in Norton.

Demographics

Demographics Norton vs Sterling heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Norton Sterling heights
Black 3 6
White 85 79
Asian 1 9
Hispanic 6 2
Two or More Races 4 4
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Norton vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 3% in Norton.
  • Norton has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 79% in Sterling heights.
  • In Sterling heights, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 1% in Norton.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Norton at 6% compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • Both Norton and Sterling heights have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Norton at 1% compared to 0% in Sterling heights.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Norton Sterling heights
Mental Health Not Good 15.1% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 9.9% 11.4%
Depression 20.2% 25.5%
Smoking 18.1% 19.8%
Binge Drinking 20.3% 17.7%
Obesity 37.7% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Norton vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.1% in Norton.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Sterling heights at 25.5% versus 20.2% in Norton.
  • Sterling heights has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 18.1% in Norton.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Norton at 20.3% compared to 17.7% in Sterling heights.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Norton at 37.7% compared to 36.6% in Sterling heights.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sterling heights at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Norton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Norton Sterling heights
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.4% (3,134)
High School Diploma 17.6% (934) 18.8% (24,937)
Less than High School 13.0% (687) 16.6% (22,008)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.7% (830) 22.3% (29,518)

Education Levels Comparison: Norton vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.0% in Norton.
  • In Sterling heights, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 17.6% in Norton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sterling heights at 16.6%, compared to 13.0% in Norton.
  • In Sterling heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 15.7% in Norton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.