Demographics details for Norton, KS vs Mukilteo, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Norton, KS vs Mukilteo, WA.
| Data | Norton | Mukilteo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,301 | 21,096 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 43.6 years |
| Median Income | $52,710 | $123,036 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.8 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Norton vs Mukilteo
- The population in Mukilteo is higher at 21,096, compared to 5,301 in Norton.
- The median age in Mukilteo is higher at 43.6 years, compared to 40.4 years in Norton.
- Mukilteo has a higher median income of $123,036, compared to $52,710 in Norton.
- In Mukilteo, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 37.0% in Norton.
- Norton has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Mukilteo.
- Mukilteo has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.8% in Norton.
Demographics
Demographics Norton vs Mukilteo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Norton | Mukilteo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 85 | 61 |
| Asian | 1 | 21 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Norton vs Mukilteo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Norton at 3% compared to 1% in Mukilteo.
- Norton has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 61% in Mukilteo.
- In Mukilteo, the Asian population stands at 21%, greater than 1% in Norton.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Norton and Mukilteo at 6%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mukilteo at 11%, compared to 4% in Norton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Norton at 1% compared to 0% in Mukilteo.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Norton | Mukilteo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 8.9% |
| Depression | 20.2% | 26.5% |
| Smoking | 18.1% | 9.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.3% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 37.7% | 29.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Norton vs Mukilteo
- More residents in Norton report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 14.6% in Mukilteo.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mukilteo at 26.5% versus 20.2% in Norton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Norton at 18.1% compared to 9.3% in Mukilteo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Norton at 20.3% compared to 15.7% in Mukilteo.
- Obesity rates are higher in Norton at 37.7% compared to 29.2% in Mukilteo.
- Disability percentages are higher in Norton at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Mukilteo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Norton | Mukilteo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.1% (24) |
| High School Diploma | 17.6% (934) | 9.7% (2,042) |
| Less than High School | 13.0% (687) | 2.0% (414) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (830) | 38.3% (8,089) |
Education Levels Comparison: Norton vs Mukilteo
- In Mukilteo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Norton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norton hold a high school diploma at 17.6% compared to 9.7% in Mukilteo.
- More residents in Norton have less than a high school education at 13.0% compared to 2.0% in Mukilteo.
- In Mukilteo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.3% compared to 15.7% in Norton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.