Demographics details for North richland hills, TX vs Stow, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in North richland hills, TX vs Stow, OH.

Data North richland hills Stow
Population 70,663 34,216
Median Age 38.7 years 39.7 years
Median Income $88,656 $89,805
Married Families 43.0% 46.0%
Poverty Level 9% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.9 4.9

Population Comparison: North richland hills vs Stow

  • In North richland hills, the population is higher at 70,663, compared to 34,216 in Stow.
  • The median age in Stow is higher at 39.7 years, compared to 38.7 years in North richland hills.
  • Stow has a higher median income of $89,805, compared to $88,656 in North richland hills.
  • In Stow, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 43.0% in North richland hills.
  • North richland hills has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Stow.
  • Stow has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.9% in North richland hills.

Demographics

Demographics North richland hills vs Stow provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic North richland hills Stow
Black 6 3
White 59 89
Asian 4 3
Hispanic 20 1
Two or More Races 10 4
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: North richland hills vs Stow

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in North richland hills at 6% compared to 3% in Stow.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Stow at 89% compared to 59% in North richland hills.
  • The Asian population is larger in North richland hills at 4% compared to 3% in Stow.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in North richland hills at 20% compared to 1% in Stow.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in North richland hills at 10% compared to 4% in Stow.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in North richland hills at 1% compared to 0% in Stow.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric North richland hills Stow
Mental Health Not Good 16.0% 15.4%
Physical Health Not Good 10.3% 9.4%
Depression 23.6% 23.6%
Smoking 14.1% 14.8%
Binge Drinking 18.4% 19.5%
Obesity 32.4% 38.3%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: North richland hills vs Stow

  • More residents in North richland hills report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 15.4% in Stow.
  • Both cities have comparable depression rates at 23.6%.
  • Stow has a higher smoking rate at 14.8% compared to 14.1% in North richland hills.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Stow at 19.5% compared to 18.4% in North richland hills.
  • Stow has higher obesity rates at 38.3% compared to 32.4% in North richland hills.
  • Disability percentages are higher in North richland hills at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Stow.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level North richland hills Stow
No Schooling 0.9% (621) 0.6% (208)
High School Diploma 12.9% (9,109) 14.9% (5,110)
Less than High School 9.6% (6,756) 3.7% (1,256)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 24.5% (17,331) 33.7% (11,546)

Education Levels Comparison: North richland hills vs Stow

  • A higher percentage of residents in North richland hills have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.6% in Stow.
  • In Stow, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.9% compared to 12.9% in North richland hills.
  • More residents in North richland hills have less than a high school education at 9.6% compared to 3.7% in Stow.
  • In Stow, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.7% compared to 24.5% in North richland hills.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.