Demographics details for North port, FL vs Sacred heart, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in North port, FL vs Sacred heart, MN.

Data North port Sacred heart
Population 85,099 498
Median Age 49.5 years 53.5 years
Median Income $78,815 $59,107
Married Families 45.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 11% 6%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 4.1

Population Comparison: North port vs Sacred heart

  • In North port, the population is higher at 85,099, compared to 498 in Sacred heart.
  • The median age in Sacred heart is higher at 53.5 years, compared to 49.5 years in North port.
  • North port has a higher median income of $78,815 compared to $59,107 in Sacred heart.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in North port at 45.0% compared to 41.0% in Sacred heart.
  • North port has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 6% in Sacred heart.
  • Sacred heart has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 4.0% in North port.

Demographics

Demographics North port vs Sacred heart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic North port Sacred heart
Black 5 Data is updating
White 79 87
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 9 13
Two or More Races 6 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: North port vs Sacred heart

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in North port at 5% compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Sacred heart at 87% compared to 79% in North port.
  • The Asian population is larger in North port at 1% compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
  • Sacred heart has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 9% in North port.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in North port at 6% compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both North port and Sacred heart at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric North port Sacred heart
Mental Health Not Good 16.8% 15.0%
Physical Health Not Good 10.4% 9.6%
Depression 20.9% 23.3%
Smoking 19.0% 17.7%
Binge Drinking 18.4% 19.9%
Obesity 27.1% 37.6%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 25.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: North port vs Sacred heart

  • More residents in North port report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 15.0% in Sacred heart.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Sacred heart at 23.3% versus 20.9% in North port.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in North port at 19.0% compared to 17.7% in Sacred heart.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Sacred heart at 19.9% compared to 18.4% in North port.
  • Sacred heart has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 27.1% in North port.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sacred heart at 25.0% compared to 13.0% in North port.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level North port Sacred heart
No Schooling 0.6% (473) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.1% (13,678) 28.1% (140)
Less than High School 10.1% (8,628) 28.5% (142)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.0% (15,350) 13.3% (66)

Education Levels Comparison: North port vs Sacred heart

  • A higher percentage of residents in North port have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Sacred heart.
  • In Sacred heart, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.1% compared to 16.1% in North port.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sacred heart at 28.5%, compared to 10.1% in North port.
  • A higher percentage of residents in North port hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.0% compared to 13.3% in Sacred heart.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.