Demographics details for North port, FL vs Parker, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in North port, FL vs Parker, SD.
Data | North port | Parker |
---|---|---|
Population | 85,099 | 1,221 |
Median Age | 49.5 years | 39.3 years |
Median Income | $78,815 | $83,864 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 2.0 |
Population Comparison: North port vs Parker
- In North port, the population is higher at 85,099, compared to 1,221 in Parker.
- Residents in North port have a higher median age of 49.5 years compared to 39.3 years in Parker.
- Parker has a higher median income of $83,864, compared to $78,815 in North port.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in North port at 45.0% compared to 39.0% in Parker.
- North port has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 5% in Parker.
- The unemployment rate in North port is higher at 4.0%, compared to 2.0% in Parker.
Demographics
Demographics North port vs Parker provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | North port | Parker |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 4 |
White | 79 | 85 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 9 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: North port vs Parker
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in North port at 5% compared to 4% in Parker.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Parker at 85% compared to 79% in North port.
- The Asian population is larger in North port at 1% compared to 0% in Parker.
- The Hispanic community is larger in North port at 9% compared to 5% in Parker.
- More residents identify as two or more races in North port at 6% compared to 4% in Parker.
- In Parker, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in North port.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | North port | Parker |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 13.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 9.0% |
Depression | 20.9% | 17.8% |
Smoking | 19.0% | 16.4% |
Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 20.4% |
Obesity | 27.1% | 34.4% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: North port vs Parker
- More residents in North port report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 13.5% in Parker.
- Depression is more prevalent in North port at 20.9% compared to 17.8% in Parker.
- Smoking is more prevalent in North port at 19.0% compared to 16.4% in Parker.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Parker at 20.4% compared to 18.4% in North port.
- Parker has higher obesity rates at 34.4% compared to 27.1% in North port.
- Disability percentages are higher in North port at 13.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | North port | Parker |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (473) | 0.2% (3) |
High School Diploma | 16.1% (13,678) | 17.9% (218) |
Less than High School | 10.1% (8,628) | 13.0% (159) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.0% (15,350) | 12.9% (158) |
Education Levels Comparison: North port vs Parker
- A higher percentage of residents in North port have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Parker.
- In Parker, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.9% compared to 16.1% in North port.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Parker at 13.0%, compared to 10.1% in North port.
- A higher percentage of residents in North port hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.0% compared to 12.9% in Parker.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.