Demographics details for North port, FL vs Graham, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in North port, FL vs Graham, NC.
| Data | North port | Graham |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 85,099 | 17,856 |
| Median Age | 49.5 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $78,815 | $51,482 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: North port vs Graham
- In North port, the population is higher at 85,099, compared to 17,856 in Graham.
- Residents in North port have a higher median age of 49.5 years compared to 36.8 years in Graham.
- North port has a higher median income of $78,815 compared to $51,482 in Graham.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in North port at 45.0% compared to 34.0% in Graham.
- North port has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Graham.
- Graham has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in North port.
Demographics
Demographics North port vs Graham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | North port | Graham |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 23 |
| White | 79 | 51 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: North port vs Graham
- In Graham, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 5% in North port.
- North port has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 51% in Graham.
- Both North port and Graham have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Graham has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 9% in North port.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Graham at 8%, compared to 6% in North port.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both North port and Graham at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | North port | Graham |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 25.2% |
| Smoking | 19.0% | 20.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 27.1% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: North port vs Graham
- In Graham, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.8% in North port.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Graham at 25.2% versus 20.9% in North port.
- Graham has a higher smoking rate at 20.5% compared to 19.0% in North port.
- Binge drinking is more common in North port at 18.4% compared to 15.9% in Graham.
- Graham has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 27.1% in North port.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Graham at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in North port.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | North port | Graham |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (473) | 1.3% (227) |
| High School Diploma | 16.1% (13,678) | 16.7% (2,976) |
| Less than High School | 10.1% (8,628) | 16.2% (2,884) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.0% (15,350) | 14.6% (2,610) |
Education Levels Comparison: North port vs Graham
- In Graham, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.6% in North port.
- In Graham, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.7% compared to 16.1% in North port.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Graham at 16.2%, compared to 10.1% in North port.
- A higher percentage of residents in North port hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.0% compared to 14.6% in Graham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.