Demographics details for North port, FL vs Draper, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in North port, FL vs Draper, UT.
Data | North port | Draper |
---|---|---|
Population | 85,099 | 50,731 |
Median Age | 49.5 years | 33.6 years |
Median Income | $78,815 | $126,041 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: North port vs Draper
- In North port, the population is higher at 85,099, compared to 50,731 in Draper.
- Residents in North port have a higher median age of 49.5 years compared to 33.6 years in Draper.
- Draper has a higher median income of $126,041, compared to $78,815 in North port.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both North port and Draper at 45.0%.
- North port has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 0% in Draper.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both North port and Draper at 4.0%.
Demographics
Demographics North port vs Draper provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | North port | Draper |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 2 |
White | 79 | 81 |
Asian | 1 | 4 |
Hispanic | 9 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: North port vs Draper
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in North port at 5% compared to 2% in Draper.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Draper at 81% compared to 79% in North port.
- In Draper, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in North port.
- The Hispanic community is larger in North port at 9% compared to 7% in Draper.
- Both North port and Draper have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both North port and Draper at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | North port | Draper |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 16.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 8.7% |
Depression | 20.9% | 25.3% |
Smoking | 19.0% | 7.1% |
Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 27.1% | 28.2% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: North port vs Draper
- More residents in North port report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.0% in Draper.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Draper at 25.3% versus 20.9% in North port.
- Smoking is more prevalent in North port at 19.0% compared to 7.1% in Draper.
- Binge drinking is more common in North port at 18.4% compared to 16.7% in Draper.
- Draper has higher obesity rates at 28.2% compared to 27.1% in North port.
- Disability percentages are higher in North port at 13.0% compared to 6.0% in Draper.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | North port | Draper |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (473) | 0.7% (347) |
High School Diploma | 16.1% (13,678) | 7.4% (3,771) |
Less than High School | 10.1% (8,628) | 4.1% (2,077) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.0% (15,350) | 30.1% (15,258) |
Education Levels Comparison: North port vs Draper
- In Draper, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in North port.
- A higher percentage of residents in North port hold a high school diploma at 16.1% compared to 7.4% in Draper.
- More residents in North port have less than a high school education at 10.1% compared to 4.1% in Draper.
- In Draper, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 18.0% in North port.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.